language poetry specimen « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘language poetry specimen’ Category

Entry 1207 — The Experioddicist, July 1993, P.4

Sunday, September 8th, 2013

ExperioddicistPage4

Note: I consider Geof’s poem a masterpiece–one of more than a few he’s done I wish I’d done.

.

Entry 942 — “eapt,” by (surprise!) John M. Bennett

Tuesday, December 4th, 2012

The following poem John M. Bennett posted yesterday to Spidertangle and elsewhere, at once struck me as among the very best of the huge number of superior poems he has done.  Partially out of laziness, but partially also to give others a chance to reflect on the poem without the temptation of seeing what I have to say about it and possibly being deflected from their own equal or better discoveries, I am going to just let it sit here uncritiqued today.

eapt

 

flooded haphtic duu

stt’s yr nodte nude

)label streaming( to )ss

ed( cash an )slo

shshed( where the

moumouthless lungch

“lost’s tea cher” )fol

ded yellp(

 

sot ,dusty

.

Mike Gunderloy « POETICKS

Posts Tagged ‘Mike Gunderloy’

Entry 99 — MATO2, Chapter 2.07

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

What follows is something I compiled from a mixture of writings I wrote about The World of Zines. Some of it may be repetitions of passages in published materials, and some may be material I deleted from articles that were too long for publication.  I may have published some of it, too, who knows.  In any case, it adds to my picture of the history of Factsheet Five.

Comments on The World of Zines

Mike Gunderloy had been active in the micro-press for some ten years when I joined his team, having then–at the age of 22 or so–founded Factsheet Five as a sort of “zine zine” specializing in reviewing other zines (a zine being a kind of periodical that is to small press magazines what the latter are to, well, Cosmopolitan or NewsWeek).  Factsheet Five was purely a hobby for Gunderloy at first.  Working out of his garage (or the equivalent), he gradually turned it into something resembling a real business, eventually having it printed by offset and getting it commercially distributed.  His last issue had a press run of over 10,000 copies.  That in itself wasn’t enough to bring him financial success.  What it did, though, was establish him as an authority on zines, which were the subject of the book Penguin signed him up for, The World of Zines.  And now he’s getting national press coverage–and making at least a little money.

According to one newspaper article on Gunderloy, at least one other editor has recently been directly absorbed from a zine into the BigTime: a fellow named Christian Gore.  Seven years ago, at the age of 19, Gore started a six-page zine on movies called Film Threat that is now a slickzine with a circulation of 125,000.  So, while the only sane reason to begin a zine is to say things, however privately, that the mainstream isn’t, dreaming of one day reaching a public of some size is not entirely irrational.

In any event, if you’re at all interested in zines–as a publisher or would-be publisher of one, or as just a reader–I highly recommend The World of Zines to you.  It provides excellent, if brief, reviews, such as the one that follows concerning Raleigh Clayton’s Fugitive Pope (available for $1 in cash or stamps from Raleigh Clayton Muns, 7351-A Burrwood Dr., St. Louis MO 63121), which I chose at random from the 300-plus that are discussed in The World of Zines, seems to me typical of the genre.  Here’s what Gunderloy and his co-editor Cari Goldberg Janice have to say about it:

“Life as a librarian need not be terminally dull, as Raleigh proves over and over again in these pages.  He recounts strange questions encountered at the reference desk, gives us glimpses of what it’s really like in librarian school and suggests ways to discourage masturbation in the stacks.  Along the way, bits and pieces of obscure writing are dropped in–almost as much fun as finding them serendipitously among the stacks.”

Note Fugitive Pope’s resemblance to an ongoing letter.  Such is generally what most zines resemble, though a letter usually confined to some central subject–a librarian’s life here, flying saucers (UFO) or old Norse religions (Asynjur) elsewhere.  Comics, sports, sci fi, hobbies and collecting, “hip whatnot,” travel, and–this a single category– splatter, death & other good news are just some of the other general topics the zines reviewed get into.

It is refreshing to note that Gunderloy and Janice include on their pages almost as many graphics, rants, poems and other matter culled from the zines under review as they do commentary. Hence, we’re not just told about zines, we’re meaningfully exposed to parts of them.

Contact and ordering information for every zine mentioned is included, too.  Moreover, a number of pages at the book’s end deal in detail with the nitty-grit of starting, running and circulating one’s own zine.  This should make The World of Zines highly useful, particularly for people outside the knownstream who have incorrect interests, or lack credentials, but who nonetheless want to have some kind of voice in their culture, however small.

Of course, it can’t be said that The World of Zines is perfect: every connoisseur of the field will find dozens of terrible omissions (where, for example, is my favorite zine, the subtle journal of raw coinage?!?).  Considering that there are something like 20,000 zines extant (according to the authors’ estimate, which seems sound to me), this is inevitable.  It is not important, for the object of the book is to introduce the scene it covers, not exhaustively memorialize it, and this The World of Zines does with efficiency and flair.

Here endeth the history of my involvement in Factsheet Five. Later I’ll be quoting from columns I wrote for it.

Entry 397 — The Long Division Machine in Action « POETICKS

Entry 397 — The Long Division Machine in Action

From a May 2009 blog entry (because, again, I have nothing better to post):

This pretty exactly shows how a long division example strikes me: that is, I see it, in motion, rather than read it.  I feel it.  Hence, it’s automatically more meaningful to me than it is to most others.  I find it wonderful how the dividend shed can take two terms and chunk out one meaningful way they relate to each other.

Leave a Reply

Entry 588 — Back to “the the” « POETICKS

Entry 588 — Back to “the the”

 A brand-new mathemaku I got the simple idea for a few days ago and made on my computer yesterday.  One thing I dislike a great deal about it is that it is an opinion poem–worse, the opinion is a political one.  But it has a nice graphic taken from my Long Division of Poetry series to which a photograph of outer space taken by the Hubble telescope has been added.  A central meaning of its remainder, which I stole from the fourth frame of my “Suite for Odysseus” is “mystery.”  As you all should know, its dividend, which I use in lots of poems, is from a poem by Wallace Stevens.

 

* * *

 Thursday, 8 December 2011, 3 P.M.  I’m in a good mood.  The poem above came out reasonably well, and smoothly–and gave me something for this blog entry.  It will probably be in my show, so counts as work done for that.  But I also got one of my piece for that into a frame that can be set on a counter, which counts indisputably as work for the show.   Meanwhile, I’ve disconnected completely from my Shakespeare book.  Next, I have to get a press release for the show done.  Should be easy but I’m having trouble pumping myself up to do it.

.

Leave a Reply

Entry 388 — Visual Poem, 10 February 2007 « POETICKS

Entry 388 — Visual Poem, 10 February 2007

.

.

This I posted in my previous blog.  I don’t know why I like it, but I liked it right after doing it, and each of the two subsequent times I happened to encounter it, so here it is.

Leave a Reply

Mathematical Poetry « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Mathematical Poetry’ Category

Entry 1759 — A Possibly Finished Poem

Saturday, March 21st, 2015

HomageToGomringer21March2015FinalOoops, the above is not my final version, this is:

HomageToGomringer21March2015

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1709 — I Done A New Math Pome!!!!

Friday, January 30th, 2015

The following is an accident, whether a happy one or a disappointing one, who knows.  What happened was that I was looking through my digital files for a poem for Bill Michele and came across the divisor and dividend of this one in a folder labeled, “Long Division Problems Worth Attacking.”  I immediately wanted to attack it.  What’s below is the result (so far–I’m not sure whether it needs more work or not):

SentimentalLongDivision Poem-No.1

 

I think I was in the mood to work on it because of my thinking about HSAM yesterday.  It may be my first autobiographical long division poem.  The only unauthentic thing in it is the divisor.  Actually, they may well have been there, hard to imagine they would not have been.  But they’re not in my memory of the episode.  Extremely sentimental, yes?  It’s very simple but perhaps still “difficult” for many . . .   Will it nonetheless make me famous?

I’d sorta like to do more poems like it, but have no ideas for any yet.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1604 — Almost Finished

Saturday, October 18th, 2014

.

Here’s my “light” poem again:

.

FaerealityIntoAthensRevised

I felt that “faereality” was strained as my divisor.  I wanted light becoming Apollo, whom I consider a god of rationality, times a kind of reverse of rationality, and faereality was certainly that, but it felt wrong.  I believe now that what was wrong with it was that it opposed reality as well as rationality, and I don’t think of Athens as being significantly unreal.  I considered using “intuition” or “intui-tiveness,” but felt they were to abstract.  Then I thought of “X,” representing the unknown.  It could stand for anything, which made it an easy choice–but also a kind of cop-out.  So I made it a window on a part of faereality, or (happy) magic.  I could take Athens as being to a degree magical, but only to the small degree I thought my fragment of faereality would give it.  As I write this, I’m no longer sure I was right.

In any case, I soon felt my “X” was too lazy a choice.  At that point, I remembered the version of “mystery” I’d used in my “Odysseus Suite,” and re-used elsewhere.  I thought I might use it times X as my divisor.  When I found it, though, I saw it already had an “x!”  I changed it slightly to what it is here.  It worked pretty well, I thought, for the amazing rise of Athens was as mysterious as it was magical.  And both opposed rationality.  The rest of my term worked, too–the combination of “idea” and “dream,” the hint of “yesterday, ” and the allusion to my poem about Odysseus, specifically the portion of it about his homecoming was a lucky bonus.

I now think I was right about including magic in my divisor.  No great event is without that.  The allusion back to several poems of mine that “faereality” is part of, is a nice extra, too.  Speaking of that, I began to make more of the fact that I was using so many things in this poem from other poems of mine: just about the whole of the divisor, but also the idea of stacked terms from more than one poem of mine, including in particular the one with the swans in it the preceded this one.  I began to think that I might by now, without thinking about it, have developed a sort of set visiopoetic mathematical terms.   What, I wondered, if I were to begin consciously making such terms and repeating them through a sequence as a way of knitting it more effectively together.  Inter-textuality.  Something to think about . . .

As for this particular poem, it still needs a background, and I probably need to color “Athens.”  I may have all its essential components right, though.

* * *

Note: Yesterday I saw my GP and he felt my problems with the my legs were due to various back problems we already knew about but considered minor.  He still feels my problem is minor but no longer so minor as to ignore, so he prescribed physical therapy.  I’ll be signing up for it on Monday.  I’m to go back to him if there are no signs of its helping in two weeks.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1603 — Thoughts and a Story

Friday, October 17th, 2014

The following is from an email I sent to Karl Kempton in reply to a thoughtful response of his to my entry of today, the 16th:

Still walking on partial legs.  Being the kind of person I am, I’m thinking maybe what’s screwing me up is polio: in fact, I’m hoping it’s that instead of what I’m sure it is: brain cancer–although I had some kind of scan of my brain when I went to the hospital a month or so ago about this same problem and it was negative.

One interesting thing: I’ve sort of given up on myself–and it’s a kind of release: I’m just doing things I like to do, the heck with the things I think I should do.  Fortunately most of the things I like best to do may be worth doing, like an essay I’m writing about my “Mathemaku No. 10,” which is on the cover of the Journal of Mathematics and the Arts.  I’m calling the essay, “The Story of My One Almost-Famous Poem” (“almost-famous” because it got into a college textbook, then into a hard-cover mathematics poetry anthology and finally into the JMA).  I’m trying to depict the lot of the invisible poet.

Here’s the essay I was working on–which I find too cut and dry, so I guess it’s a rough draft:

The Story of my One Almost-Famous Poem
by Bob Grumman

MathemakuNo10The poem above was first published in a micropress publication containing just 7 poems of mine called, simply, Mathemaku 6-12.  The press (which I term a “micropress” because too small in readership to be considered a “small press”) was “tel-let,” the publisher was John Martone, the poems involved were what I considered to be mathematical haiku—i.e., short lyrical poems in which a metaphorically significant mathematical operation, like the long division of “Mathemaku No. 10,” was carried out.

John had previously published the first five of my mathemaku in 1992 in a collection called, yes, Mathemaku 1-5.  Mathemaku 13-19 came out in 1996. Like me, John was what people call “an experimental poet”—and I call “an otherstream poet,” meaning basically a poet seeking poetic fulfillment in a different stream than the one most poets do.  Hence, we were both getting published in the same very few magazines receptive to unconventional poetry.  I don’t remember now how it came about, but a correspondence developed between us.  Soon after that, I used my micropress, the Runaway Spoon Press, to publish some of his poems, and he reciprocated by publishing some of mine . . . or vice versa.  Such is the way it generally is in the micropress: it’s either self-publication or publication by colleagues who like what one is doing.

During the next ten or fifteen years, “Mathemaku No. 10” got re-published a few times, mostly at my poetry blog, poeticks.com, or elsewhere on the Internet.  Eventually, came its publication (as a visual poem, which it is not) in the college textbook the half-page I’ve reproduced is from.  Interestingly, I was supposed to get paid for my contribution with a copy of the book, but never did, nor did anyone replay to the letters I sent the publisher about what I thought was a minor mix-up.  I eventually bought a second-hand softcover copy of the thing from Amazon.

It’s not a visual poem in my view, incidentally, because the heart and the two pieces of arithmetical paraphernalia are the only things in it that are not purely verbal, and they are all symbols with specific meanings, just like words, much more than suggestive visual images, so I consider them to be acting primarily as words, albeit pictorial.

The textbook was printed in an edition of over a hundred thousand, I believe.  And one student actually wrote me about my poem!  A year later it was included in the only other hardbound book I’ve ever had anything in: an anthology called Strange Attractors, edited by Sarah Glaz and JoAnne Growney, who were among the poets writing mathematics-related poems that I had recently met at a conference for such people in Washington, D.C., having by then encountered some of them on the Internet.

As a result of my friendship with Sarah, my poem made its final splash (so far!) with an appearance on the cover of the March-June 2014 issue of Journal of Mathematics and the Arts (with an essay on “visiomathematical poetry and a book review by me inside!) that Sarah had been the guest-editor of.

And here, in this essay, is my poem yet again.  But it can’t possibly make me more almost-famous, can it?

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1602 — Long Division of Athens

Thursday, October 16th, 2014

Here’s my latest, unfinished:

FaerealityIntoAthens

The neato recreation of Ancient Athens in my poem was stolen from www.sikyon.com.  It is copyrighted by Ellen Papkyriakou/ Anagnostou, with all rights reserved.  If I’m still around in 2015, I’ll try to get permission from her to use it here.  Still here, you wonder?  Well, I think my nervous system is about to go.  Lou Gehrig’s disease?  I don’t know.  I seem to only be half in touch with the lower part of my legs, especially after sitting for a half-hour or more.  It’s as though they are on the way to being asleep.  I can still walk on them, but if I jog a few paces, I feel the left one beginning to give way.  I will be seeing my regular doctor Friday.  A week or so after that I have an appointment with the surgeon who did my hip replacement.  My hip now feels about the way it did when I went to him to get the replacement.  Whether that’s related to my leg problem, I don’t know.  It’s quite interesting.  Needless to say, I give myself only a fifty-fifty chance to make it into 2015, but that’s just me, always sure of the worst when anything like this happens to me, but sure of the best when it happens to anybody else.  Anyway, I’m proud of myself for finally converting my notes for the thing above into a semi-finished product.  Gotta add color, and I may change the divisor, but don’t feel up to it right now (15 October, 2 P.M.).

Nota Morbeedissima: if I don’t never finish the above, I’d be grateful is someone else did, following how I done my swan one.  Actually, I would not be able to be grateful, but you know wot I mean.

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1597 — My Swan Poem, Finished

Saturday, October 11th, 2014

ReasonIntoDreams10October2014

I finished this at around 5 P.M, yesterday, and immediately stuck it here.  I plan to comment on it tomorrow, when perhaps I’ve calmed down a little about how terrific it is.

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1589 — “Homage to Debussy”

Friday, October 3rd, 2014

A month or two ago, I suddenly had ideas for poems that I took notes on.  Seeing the notes yesterday when hunting for something else I never found, I saw enough of the poem below to work it out.  I made the version below this morning.  It’s not finished.  I want to think a little more about it.  I feel “reason” and “intuition” need inner colors.  I hope an idea for a background occurs to me, although I wouldn’t say it needs one.  The interior of “dreams,” by the way, consists of a fragment of “faereality” from other poems using that, with the coloring shown here.  My clever little way of alluding faery magic into this poem’s idea of a dream.

Reason)Dream2

Conclusion: my career as a poet ain’t over quite yet, I guess.  The one thing that bothers me about my few recent works is how little visimagery counts in them.

Observation: whenever I get intensely into one project, I seem to flood with ideas for others.  Nice, but the danger is my getting distracted into four or five completing projects.  But I did finish the second-to-last draft (for some reason, I just don’t want to use “penultimate”) of my novel yesterday.  And I swear I’ll get the final draft done before 2015.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1586 — “Moonlight Equation”

Tuesday, September 30th, 2014

intuition + reason = moonlight + pond

I’m bringing the poem above back from an earlier but recent entry because when I just happened to see it Sunday night, it made me realize a virtue of mathematical poetry I hadn’t thought of before: that an simple equation in the form a + b = c + d  strongly suggests each of the terms has a different value than the others; hence a must be part c and part d, which means the reader has an extra meaning to muse about: in my poem, just how much moonlight, for instance, is intuition, and how much reason.  Ditto for each of the others.  In other words, “intuition + reason = pond” would be a nice poem, but not nearly as loaded as “intuition + reason = moonlight + pond.”  To over-argue my point, the three-term poem consists of one mathematical idea, the other of five mathematical ideas.

No more for this entry.  I’m having another tired of my tired days, but just got through another chapter of my book, one I don’t think I made more than two or three changes to.

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1568 — Me ‘n’ Riesman, Part 2

Friday, September 12th, 2014

After more reading of The Lonely Crowd, I’ve decided I’m very much inner-directed, according to Riesman’s description of the type.  I got him wrong when I though his inner-directed type was similar to my rigidnik.  I now an unsure how his autonomous type differs from his inner-directed type.  According to Riesman, many of his readers, including colleagues of his, confused the two.  I now see why–and Riesman himself seems to consider it a natural mistake.  (He is excellently self-critical, it seems to me, but has surprising blind spots: for instance, about the possibility of innate psychological tendencies: he mentions such a possibility every once in a while, but quickly drops the subject, seeming to take social determinism the only important kind of determinism in the main body of his book–or so my impression is after not going very far in it.)

I’m also wondering how Riesman’s other-directed types ultimately differ from his tradition-directed types.  Possibly, I just thought, because their memories coincide with their environmental input?  They pray to whomever their tribal god is only partly because they’ve been trained to, but mostly because everyone else in the tribe is.  The inner-directed person prays to his god because of his indoctrination entirely: he more or less has to because he is part of Riesman’s inner-directed society and thus not sure of having the right people to imitate.

The autonomous person will differ from the inner-directed person only in that he will be much more likely to question his indoctrination.

* * *

Last night while lying in bed hoping for sleep to come, I suddenly had a few ideas for poems, two of which follow:

intuition + reason = moonlight + pond

MathemakuOceanaI’m not sure whether they’re finished or not, or whether, if finished, they’re keepers or not.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1540 — A New Work of Mine at Truck

Saturday, August 16th, 2014

Just an announcement today as I ccontinue to try to get my current reviews out of the way (and do seem to slowly be succeeding in doing so).  Go here to see “An Evening in June, 1952,” a nostalikuical long division about (sob) my lost boyhood, mostly the part of it spent in boys’ adventure books, but also actual times camping out. Click once on my poem to see a better version of it.

The codes are simple, but I’ve put hints that help down at the far right, if you need them. Further hints available for $12 apiece at HINTS, 1708 Hayworth Road, Port Charlotte FL 33952. (Note, for those of you keeping score: yes, it is a Major Poem.) (Note, for any knownstreamer accidentally here who laughs at the presumption of my declaration, I dare you to present a cogent argument against it.  Not that my declaration isn’t intended as a joke, but only in part.  I absolutely believe it.  I don’t think all or even most, of my poems are major, but if–at my age–I didn’t feel some were it would indicate that I’ve completely wasted my life.)

(((b=a, 5=e)))

.

AmazingCounters.com

Infraverbal Poetry Specimen « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Infraverbal Poetry Specimen’ Category

Entry 1540 — A New Work of Mine at Truck

Saturday, August 16th, 2014

Just an announcement today as I ccontinue to try to get my current reviews out of the way (and do seem to slowly be succeeding in doing so).  Go here to see “An Evening in June, 1952,” a nostalikuical long division about (sob) my lost boyhood, mostly the part of it spent in boys’ adventure books, but also actual times camping out. Click once on my poem to see a better version of it.

The codes are simple, but I’ve put hints that help down at the far right, if you need them. Further hints available for $12 apiece at HINTS, 1708 Hayworth Road, Port Charlotte FL 33952. (Note, for those of you keeping score: yes, it is a Major Poem.) (Note, for any knownstreamer accidentally here who laughs at the presumption of my declaration, I dare you to present a cogent argument against it.  Not that my declaration isn’t intended as a joke, but only in part.  I absolutely believe it.  I don’t think all or even most, of my poems are major, but if–at my age–I didn’t feel some were it would indicate that I’ve completely wasted my life.)

(((b=a, 5=e)))

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1538 — Curiosities?

Thursday, August 14th, 2014

I’m really cheating today: I’m using part of a review or column for Small Press Review that I’ve been working here.  The work I’m reviewing is Richard Kostelanetz’s Ouroboros (see Entry 1535):

An ouroboros is a mythological serpent swallowing its tale, so an excellent title for this collection of 188 words like, well, “ouroboros,” swallowing their tails, each time adding at least one interesting word to what they’re saying, “sour,” in the case of “ouroboros.” They are set in a highly appropriate, highly dramatic font called “Wide Latin”—very bold and jabbingly pointed at all extremities. It’s definitely fun to find smaller words inside Kostelanetz’s specimens of “circular writing,” as he terms it: “tea,” “pet,” and “petite,” for example, in “appetite,” as well as “appetite” itself, which one discovers rather than automatically sees, or “tin,” “descent,” and, most important,” “scent” in “incandescent” (because of the poetic jolt light as an immaterial scent, or a scent as immaterial light suggest to those sensitive to connotation). But can such objects be considered poems—rather than “curiosities” .

I told Chris Lott that I would explain why I thought certain arrangements of numbers Richard had made were more than curiosities, and that I’d soon explain why I thought that.  Here, quickly, using Richard’s circular words, I’ll give the gist of my reasoning that some  of them are, the ones that: accentuate connotative value, a virtue of poems although not necessarily a defining quality, and in the process create an image complex of aesthetic value, the way I think “appetite” turns eating into a very feminine tea party, and “incandescent” makes “scent” and “incandescence” plausible metaphors for each other; that they also sslow the reading of them, as any effective poem must (although I do not consider that a defining characteristic, either, but the result of defining characteristics, like the flow-breaks line-breaks serve as in free verse, and the extreme flow-break of a word being spelled into a circle); and, least important, but still important, they are decontextualized from prose, both by simply being called poems and by not being visually rose.

Richard’s number poems are somewhat different.  I hope to discuss them, too, before long.

One further note.  Many of Richard’s circular words combine into interesting narratives full of “heightened cross connotativeness,” by which I mean, one word’s  mundane connotation turning vividly into a related connotation due to a similiarly mundane connotation in an adjacent circular word.  For more on that, you’ll have to wait for my column, as I now see this text will become.  You will be able to do that by subscribing to Small Press Review, which I wish a few of you would do; or by waiting for me to post the column in my Pages here a few months after it is published.

Note #2: I do not consider circular words to be visual poems; for me, they are visually-enhanced infra-verbal poems–the poetic value lies almost entirely on what goes on inside them verbally.  Although you might say their visual sspin flicks connotations into view . . .

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1309 — A Little Quartet

Tuesday, December 24th, 2013

With thanks to Mark Sonnenfeld in whose whose latest Marymark Press broadside it appears:

Housekeeper

.

Entry 1279 — Cumminfluenced Itemgs from 2006

Sunday, November 24th, 2013

CummingsAndGongsCoveryou'retoooldnowunderGoingGong

.

Entry 1250 — Rejected Pwoermd

Saturday, October 26th, 2013

I was going to use the pwoermd, “mythstery,” inside the open letters of “the core of faereality,” which is the dividend of a set of long division poems I’ve been working on, but decided it was too frothily cute.  But maybe not worthless?  Anyway, here it is.  And I’m outta here.

.

Entry 1034 — A Math Poem by Ed Conti

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

Million

This is an extremely plural specimen of plurexpressiveness: an infraverbal, visual, mathmatical poem by the best composer of infraverbal light verse I know of, and among the best light verse poets of any kind, Ed Conti. To see some other great examples of his work, go here.
.

Entry 995 — A Gem by Kevin Kelly

Saturday, January 26th, 2013

The following is a pwoermd Kevin Kelly posted to Spidertangle the other day:

hearthththrob

I like the way it makes me, at any rate, close to simultaneously strongly, sympathetically identify with the one whose heart throb is involved, and laugh at the poor jerk.  The lisp of the heartbeats is any excellent touch, too.  Not to mention the stuttering attempt to say, “the,” but not be able to.  Never has “heart throb” been so fully writ.

.

Entry 929 — a form of i

Wednesday, November 21st, 2012

I got home yesterday afternoon after a very nice, mostly relaxing time at my niece, Laura’s, wedding (getting to which was the only unrelaxing time, because of my old man’s plumbing), and visiting my brother’s and sister’s families.  I got a few things done once home, and this morning, but want to take the rest of the day off, so will only post the bit of light infraverbal poetry below–which I came up mwith last night and, believe it or not, don’t consider mathematical, unless you want to call understanding that the square root of minus one equals i in mathematics makes it so.  Calling it mathematical would be like calling “1self” mathematical.  Using math symbols does not make a text mathematical; only showing and using math operations does that.  For me.

Note: in mathematics, i stands for imaginary, because solution, being impossible to determine, is “imaginary.”  I expect to be using it in upcoming math poems, and possibly the entire piece above.

.

msn spaces tracking
AllOnlineCoupons.co.uk

Entry 855 — An Appropriately Titled “Untitled”

Saturday, September 8th, 2012

The following infraverbal masterpiece is the world’s first artwork given the title, “Untitled,” appropriately. It’s just one of the 78 pieces in Identities, a collection of work by Irving Weiss just out from Xexoxial Editions.  It’s something to wonder through many more times than once, with a fantastic skitter through the arts, from low to high, 100% verbal to 100% visual, the comic to the largest ultimates (as well as a combination of both). I hope to say more about it here and elsewhere.

  .

Entry 846 — A Pwoermd by Stephen Nelson

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

Stephen composed this in a dream!  I think that happened to me once.

I consider it primarily an infraverbal poem, because dependent on what happens inside it.  But it is also a visual poem.  What makes it terrific is that, as spelled, it is a double metaphor: for (1) shape-changing flexibility, and (2) a flood surging forward too quickly for its spelling to bother with correctness–but brilliantly describing it as well as denoting it.  I got it from the Otherstream Unlimited site, where I called it “an instant classic.”

.

Entry 396 — A Visual Haiku « POETICKS

Entry 396 — A Visual Haiku

I’m still pretty much too out of it to do a real blog entry, so here’s this from the 15 February 2009 entry to my previous blog:

.

.

I did a series of 5/7/5 images inspired by Scott Helmes’s slightly different visual haiku.   This one I like enough to send with two or three variations on it to Jeff Hansen, who is editing a selection of poetry for Mad Hatters’ Review.

.


Leave a Reply

Entry 402 — Three Ellipses « POETICKS

Entry 402 — Three Ellipses

These are all from my previous blog.  The top one is “Ellipsis No. 10,” by Marton Koppany.  The second is my variation on that, and the third a second variation on it by me.   There here partly because, again, I could not come up with anything else to post, and partly because today I finished buying bus tickets to and from Jacksonville, Florida, where I’ll be visiting with Marton Saturday, 2 April.  Anyone who’ll also be there then, let me know.  Especially if you have a bed I can sleep in on Friday!

.

.

.

.

.

.

One Response to “Entry 402 — Three Ellipses”

  1. marton koppany says:

    Thanks for posting these, Bob!

    Hopefully see you soon,
    Marton

Leave a Reply

Entry 1760 — Another New Poem « POETICKS

Entry 1760 — Another New Poem

finishedPoem
Title: Cryptographiku in Praise of the Imagination

.

AmazingCounters.com

Leave a Reply