Entry 1092 — More Cursive Writing by Irving Weiss « POETICKS

Entry 1092 — More Cursive Writing by Irving Weiss

I was going to discuss the minimalist works of the previous entry in this one but had so much trouble simply setting the entry up due to my deranged computer and/or my blogsite’s programming, that I couldn’t continue after losing half my commentary, who knows why.  In desperation, I scanned another piece that was in Irving Weiss’s Number Poems (The Runaway Spoon Press, 1997) and managed to post it here:

AMomentAgo

Nifty visiopoetic portrait of a lady, I think.  I haven’t tried super-hard to read the writing but suspect it consists of various scribbled female names–one is Echo.   Wait, at the top are Scylla and Daphne.  I now suspect these are all nymphs or the like who suffered badly at the hands of various gods and goddesses–hence, if full life only a moment.  And en masse here a barely legible flurry representative of all the feminine magic and mystery of the old religions now long-gone.

.

Comments are closed.

Alison Bielski « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Alison Bielski’ Category

Entry 31 — Old Blog Entries 663 through 670

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

In #663, I presented my Odysseus Suite–but the reproduction is too crude for me to re-post it here.   My next entry featured this, by Endwar:

TenByTenAs I announced when I first posted this, I am hoping to publish an anthology of mathematical poems, like this one, so if you have one or know of one, send me a copy of it, or tell me about it.

#665 had this by Marton Koppany, which I have to post here because it was dedicated to ME:

Odysseus

Hey, it’s mathematical, too.  The next entry, whose number I fear to state, concerned this:

Bielski-Haiku-BW

This is from Typewriter Poems, an anthology published by Something Else Press and Second Aeon back in 1972. It’s by Alison Bielski, An English woman born in 1925 whose work I’m unfamiliar with. I find this specimen a charmer . . . but am not sure what to make of it. Three lines, as in the classic haiku. The middle one is some sort of filter. Is “n” the “n” in so much mathematics? If so, what’s the poem saying? And where does the night and stars Hard for me not to assume come in? Pure mathematics below, a sort of practical mathematics above? That idea would work better for me if the n’s were in the lower group rather than in the other. Rather reluctantly, I have to conclude the poem is just a texteme design. I hope someone more clever sets me right, though. (I’m pretty sure I’ve seen later visio-textual works using the same filter idea–or whatever the the combination of +’s. =’s and n’s is, but can’t remember any details.)

It was back to my lifelong search for a word meaning “partaker of artwork” in #667–but I now believe “aesthimbiber,” which I thought of in a post earlier than #667, I believe, but dropped, may be the winner of my search.

Next entry topic was about what visual poets might do to capture a bigger audience.  I said nothing worth reposting on a topic going nowhere because visual poets, in general, are downright inimical to doing anything as base as trying to increase their audience.   One suggestion I had was to post canonical poems along with visual poems inspired by them, which I mention because in my next entry, I did just that, posting a Wordsworth sonnet and a visual poem I did based on and quoting part of it–and don’t re-post here because of space limitations.  I wrote about the two in the final entry in this set of ten old blog entries.

 

Matthew Stolte « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Matthew Stolte’ Category

Entry 918 — Another Collaboration

Saturday, November 10th, 2012

I’ve reproduced the cover of Jem Tabs, the collection of collaborations between John Bennett and Matthew Stolte:

 

I seem to be  going through a very empty period creatively, I think because I’ll soon be taking a short trip north for a niece’s wedding.  Having to travel too far from home always screws up my mind.  Anyway, I had to scramble to find something to put in this entry.  I grabbed this mainly because, for some reason, I love the idea of scrawled words inside large letters, or parts of letters.  There’s something metaphorically important involved but I can’t yet finger it.  Needless to say, I like the way the thing looks, too.  And it’s always worthwhile giving such material a plug. 

.

Entry 916 — Stolte & Topel

Thursday, November 8th, 2012

Today I have another specimen of collaboration for you, something by Matthew Stolte and Andrew Topel from their ATORVTTK:

This is “just” a collage, but–frankly–I can’t yet begin to interpret it.  That’s after the brief scan that is enough for me usually to see an entrance to some kind of meaning.  Actually, the problem here might be to many entrances at once–which is definitely not a fault but a virtue that forces a pleruser to take a long time to unconfuse into proper appreciation.  I can tell at a glance that this work (which is the first unit in a long sequence) is not slotched together.  But I haven’t time yet to unconfuse, just time to enjoy the surface fun of the piece.

.

Entry 915 — Lunacy (Stolte/Bennett)

Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

Matthew Stolte is a young friend of mine whom I know only through the mail and the Internet, and John M. Bennett is an older friend of mine whom I’ve actually been within a foot or less of more than once!  They both do work I greatly admire, so you should understand that when I call their chapbook collaboration of 23 pieces (which includes the graphics on both sides of each cover), Jem Tabs, lunacy, I mean greatly to compliment it.  See below for its final interior piece and the inside of its back cover (and left-click it to see it better):

Fantasy Scenario Number Two: Jesus pays a visit to me and tells me I have two choices: (1) live healthily to the age of a hundred but continue having the sort of days I’ve had all my life–i.e., neither horrideously crappy nor particularly whoopeeic, or (2) spend a week with a 100 wacks like Matthew and John (hmmm, Jesus and Matthew and John?), each of whom has been hypnotized, if necessary, to want to spend twelve hours of each day we’re together, collaborating on works like the ones in Jem Tabs, and then leave this mortal coil in some innocuous manner.   Easy choice.  In other words, John and Matthew’s collabs make me drool to collaborate with either–or with the many others in our field known to enjoy collaboration.  In fact, I can’t think of any such collaborations I’ve seen that don’t have a similar effect on me.  Why aren’t I begging people to collaborate with me, then?  Too much else on my plate at the moment.

One general thought about the two pieces above: that one unarguable thing they convey is the pleasure (I almost want to say, “the ecstasy,” but that would be an exaggeration) of the search for meaning, even though it may often not fully succeed, and even sometimes find hardly any large meaning.  Most do lead one to enough discoveries to make one feel good, though.  That’s all that almost any search for meaning will do.  In the piece to the left above, I see, “shut close facet,” with the latter suggesting “focus,” because the its first four letters could be “focu,” and it ends in the center of a focusing wheel.  Then comes the whirl of the request of the reader, or someone, to “set the dribbling/ from (the speaker’s) trembling/ face,” etc. around a triangle of visimages that include what looks to me to be a human ear that is also a tunnel.  Much of a where keeps those caught in anthragreement with John and Matthew’s map willing to explore further. 

Is its verbal content enough to make it a visual poem?  I’m not sure.  The expedition is there for those lunatic enough to see it regardless.

.

Asemic Art « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Asemic Art’ Category

Entry 915 — Lunacy (Stolte/Bennett)

Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

Matthew Stolte is a young friend of mine whom I know only through the mail and the Internet, and John M. Bennett is an older friend of mine whom I’ve actually been within a foot or less of more than once!  They both do work I greatly admire, so you should understand that when I call their chapbook collaboration of 23 pieces (which includes the graphics on both sides of each cover), Jem Tabs, lunacy, I mean greatly to compliment it.  See below for its final interior piece and the inside of its back cover (and left-click it to see it better):

Fantasy Scenario Number Two: Jesus pays a visit to me and tells me I have two choices: (1) live healthily to the age of a hundred but continue having the sort of days I’ve had all my life–i.e., neither horrideously crappy nor particularly whoopeeic, or (2) spend a week with a 100 wacks like Matthew and John (hmmm, Jesus and Matthew and John?), each of whom has been hypnotized, if necessary, to want to spend twelve hours of each day we’re together, collaborating on works like the ones in Jem Tabs, and then leave this mortal coil in some innocuous manner.   Easy choice.  In other words, John and Matthew’s collabs make me drool to collaborate with either–or with the many others in our field known to enjoy collaboration.  In fact, I can’t think of any such collaborations I’ve seen that don’t have a similar effect on me.  Why aren’t I begging people to collaborate with me, then?  Too much else on my plate at the moment.

One general thought about the two pieces above: that one unarguable thing they convey is the pleasure (I almost want to say, “the ecstasy,” but that would be an exaggeration) of the search for meaning, even though it may often not fully succeed, and even sometimes find hardly any large meaning.  Most do lead one to enough discoveries to make one feel good, though.  That’s all that almost any search for meaning will do.  In the piece to the left above, I see, “shut close facet,” with the latter suggesting “focus,” because the its first four letters could be “focu,” and it ends in the center of a focusing wheel.  Then comes the whirl of the request of the reader, or someone, to “set the dribbling/ from (the speaker’s) trembling/ face,” etc. around a triangle of visimages that include what looks to me to be a human ear that is also a tunnel.  Much of a where keeps those caught in anthragreement with John and Matthew’s map willing to explore further. 

Is its verbal content enough to make it a visual poem?  I’m not sure.  The expedition is there for those lunatic enough to see it regardless.

.

Entry 889 — Another by Nancy Brush-Burr

Friday, October 12th, 2012

I love rain, so I see rain in this, and therefore love the work.  Even if no one finds rain in it but I.  More tomorrow, I hope.  I’ve just had a rough time with my computer, which for a while seemed to have crashed.  It’s okay, but the stress did me in.  (Please, if you’re just going to comment in order to denigrate the piece as scribbling or whatever instead of intelligently analyzing, hold off.)

 .

Entry 887 — Another Asemic Work

Wednesday, October 10th, 2012

This one’s by D.E.C. robbins (as his name appears in the table of contents of Asemic magazine).  I’m still a bit wobbly upstairs due to the surgical procedure I underwent yesterday, and the many errands I ran this morning, so I doubt I’ll be able to say much about it.  Its author, new to me, is from San Diego.

I was besmitten at first by the design–the four-plank rectangle in the far upper left rhyming with the filled-in rectangle near the lower right; the four broad-stroked scribbles from left to right pierced by the diagonal of hieroglyphic-like characters beginning in the lower right corner scribbled in slightly less broad strokes.  Does it do more than fascinatingly play theme and variation all over its surface, with strong suggests of textuality?  I’m not sure.  But its layers of pictured expression of some sort intrigue me.

 

.

Entry 881 — Asemaesthetica, Continued

Thursday, October 4th, 2012

With the top image of asemic art, I run into trouble, for I can’t see what’s textual about it–except for a d and an a–and a 2!  But it’s very difficult to draw something with pen or pencil and not make something that looks like a letter.  I very much like the image (which is by John M. Bennett) as a design, and can force myself to perceive it as a swoopy sort of failed attempt to communicate, but that doesn’t open into anything much, for me.  I find the face I see in it more interesting.

Jake Berry’s image below seems truly textual, though: in fact, it is probably a visual poem, for it has words, and they may well be semantically active (and I hold that a poem needs more than just words, it needs semantically-active words and they must contribute significantly as words to the work’s aesthetic meaning .  I can’t make out these well enough to see how semantically active they are but they work as map labels, so seem to me to contribute significantly enough to what the work is doing aesthetically.  I see it (so far) as an anatomical map of a male torso . . . as countryside.  Lines quivering out a sort of journey to humanness. 

.

Entry 880 — More on Asemaesthetica

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2012

From the coinage, you should be able to tell I’m back on the opium pills, whith two APCs that I’m supposed to avoid to prevent kidney damage.  But I really felt terrible today, and I really really have Important Matters to attend to, basically my next SciAm blog and my moderation duty ies for ART=TEXT=ART.  What I say here about asemic art will count as work on the latter, since it will be about the visimagery/textual interface I’ll be immersed it for that. 

Below is the image from the back cover of the issue of Asemic magazine I’ve been writing about here the past two days.  I believe it’s by “Cornelis Vleeskens (remixed by Tim Gaze),” as the front page of the magazine has it, but I’m not sure because it . . . ah, I see what my problem is now:  the image is described as from “Chinese front cover.”  Veddy clever reference to fact Chinese book start backward.  (That bit of racism was intentional, you should know, ’cause I’m incorrigible.)  Okay, first thing to  notice is that the image looks very Chinese, which I’m assuming it is not.  For me, it’s a picture of a snake as an S.  A beautifully balanced textual design suggestive of A Chinese character, but also–again, for me–of the labyrinth of ancient Crete.  Very simple, very monumental–strongly framed to emphasize both.  The S as something to enter, spend time in, to be captured by . . .  I can’t think of an expressive excuse for the rectangle but like it.  No doubt my intuition is telling me it belongs, and my critical deftness can’t find any words to explain that.  Finally, something very minor, the fact that both an S and a snake hisssssssss.

All this might be pure baloney, but heed me, mine students, my manner of exploration is a most excellent model of attack on an artwork.

 

.

 count web site traffic
Travelocity Promotion

Entry 878 — Asemic Visimagery

Monday, October 1st, 2012

 The images below are from the third issue of a zine from Australia called, Asemic magazine, compiled, designed & published by Time Gaze.  I don’t know when it was published.  I found it in a file drawer of mine in a hanging folder marked something like “Work to be looked at More Closely” with three or four other like items from anywhere from four to eight years ago.  Needless to say, I never looked at them “more closely.”  So much stuff in my house like that.  Anyway, a day or two ago I was looking for something else, which I never did find, and thought I might use some of the stuff in this drawer I should have marked, “Kept Out of Sight to Prevent Data Overload,” in my blog–which is what I’ve been trying to do for the past three hours.  My computer and/or the Internet is fighting me.  I failed several times to upload the images, and succeeded only to lose them two or three times.  Right now they seem to be in the entry below.

The top one is by Nancy Brush-Burr, the other by Theo Breuer.  Like almost all the pieces in the zine, they are untitled.  I selected them randomly, finding it almost impossible to rank them according to aesthetic value–which is not to say I didn’t find them well worth “looking at very closely.”  More on that tomorrow–if I manage to get both the images and what I’ve just typed posted today.

.

Entry 396 — A Visual Haiku « POETICKS

Entry 396 — A Visual Haiku

I’m still pretty much too out of it to do a real blog entry, so here’s this from the 15 February 2009 entry to my previous blog:

.

.

I did a series of 5/7/5 images inspired by Scott Helmes’s slightly different visual haiku.   This one I like enough to send with two or three variations on it to Jeff Hansen, who is editing a selection of poetry for Mad Hatters’ Review.

.


Leave a Reply

Entry 183 — Another by Marton « POETICKS

Entry 183 — Another by Marton

So I can’t get this entry quickly out of the way and try to get into my next column for Small Press Review, in a couple of weeks (and because I really like it!), here’s Marton Koppany’s “Arrival”:

He, like Geof Huth, is another Klee, and I have higher compliment than that (although I have a few equal compliments, like “another Pollock”).

One Response to “Entry 183 — Another by Marton”

  1. Marton Koppany says:

    Thank you so much for your encouragement, Bob! It means a lot!
    (I’ve just read your entry. I was out of town /and without internet connection/ for five days from Sunday.

    All the very best,
    Marton

Leave a Reply

Entry 1088 — “painted over red exit sign” « POETICKS

Entry 1088 — “painted over red exit sign”

I got a postcard from Guy Beining the other day.  Once again, he’s made making a blog entry an easy chore for me, for the work below was on one side of the card:

ExitSign

Whatever it is that makes the best surrealistic poems and paintings effective, this definitely has.  All I’ve made of it beyond that is that it may concern an exit denied . . .  Parts of existence not meshing, as well?  Things to think about, for sure.

.

Leave a Reply

visual poetry « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘visual poetry’ Category

Entry 138 — “Maternity Ward”

Monday, May 31st, 2010

The title of the following work is “Maternity Ward at Wesson Women’s.” Its author is Alexander Jorgensen, one of his four submissions to The Pedestal Gallery, all of them quite good but in the second twelve (in the editors’ highly subjective view).  Before he submitted it to the gallery, it appeared in Mark Young’s excellent publication, Otoliths, Issue Eleven, Southern Spring, 2008.

I first saw this at Spidertangle over a year ago, and at once liked it a good deal. I still do. For a while I thought it a perfect example of alphaconceptual textual designage, viewing it as asemic. A charmingly understated design consisting of the letter a to make it textual designage, with a, for me, strong suggestion of language soon to be born, these three a’s close to getting alphabets going.

Later I had to accept it as (barely) a visual poem, for “a” is significant as a word in it, here pregnant with whatever noun it will soon modify–a doubly alphaconceptual visual poem.  It’s also pain beautifully serene: all’s right with this world–at least to me.

I

Enter 135 — 13’s from The Pedestal Project

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Today I’m finally starting to post what I’ve decided to call “13’s from The Pedestal Project,” by which I mean my favorites of those submissions to John M. Bennett’s and my gallery of visio-textual art at The Pedestal. I call them “13’s” because the people who created them were, so to speak,  all–in my opinion–tied for thirteenth place in the competition for the twelve spots available in the gallery.

The first piece is “Fifth Grade,” by Connie Tettenborn:

When I saw this, I was biased toward it because so many of the other submissions to a gallery supposed to be of visual poetry was (tediously) not visual poetry by any reasonable definition, and this was.  I was also charmed by its evocation of what fifth grade seemed to me.  I found the choice of data the kids were being bombarded with interesting, too: it happened to include three pieces of knowledge of extreme importance to me all my life: the discovery of America (and I claim Columbus discovered America; Eric the Red or his son, whoever it was, who got to Newfoundland only extended the shoreline of Europe), long division and the planets (which in fifth grade were just about equal to dinosaurs and the Pyramids to me).

I liked the little kids in proper order–although I’m not sure why Connie uses the particular letter she does to represent them. Wait, they are, I now see, “e.g.’s” . . . I’m still not getting the connection .  In any case, one of the kids seems not paying full attention, which is a nice touch.  The idea of Knowledge coming in from some Afar that seems almost divine intrigued me, too.  There’s the concept of a window into understanding, too.

In chatting over syberspace with Connie, I’ve learned that she is new to visual poetry, so deserving of special praise for doing so well to being with.  Because she asked for help, I’m now going to say a few minor negative things about “Fifth Grade.”  One is that I’m not sure “bah bah” fits the piece as well as “blah blah” would have, and I think “gaga” and “lala” not particularly effective.  I think the choice of varied fonts good, but believe a little more could have done to the in-flow–for instance, some overlapping could have worked nicely, I think, and great difference in the size of letters.

I wondered about the use of color, finally deciding straight monochromatic, facts-only dry knowledge worked best.  But use of colr and visual imagery might be something to try, too, if the artist wanted to make a sequence of variations on a theme, which her piece would be a good start to.

Entry 134 — Ellipsis-Haiku

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

I’m still having “creative ideas” but having trouble bothering to put them on paper, even ones as easy to do that with as the ones that led to the following:

.

.

.

Good ideas (inspired by Marton Koppany’s recent Otoliths book) not yet finding their best presentation, it seems to me.

Entry 133 — Somewhat Awake Again, I Think

Friday, May 21st, 2010

I simply disconnected from my blog–just didn’t think of it for about a week until a day or two ago.  Then last night for some reason I started thinking about haiku and came up with the following poems that I thought worth making this entry for:

.

.                            early April night:
.                            barely a single haiku
.                            of moonlight in it

.

.                            the street’s cherry blooms,
.                            dazzling, yet almost grey
.                            besides the haiku’s

.

.

.

.

.

.

Entry 131 — Another Variation

Monday, May 10th, 2010

I like this one:

In fact, I’d include it among my all-time best works.

Entry 130 — A Variation

Sunday, May 9th, 2010

Guess what will be next in this series?

I’m not sure I like the colors in the addition.  Oh, well, it’s something to use for another entry.  I’ve had another setback, by the way: a very close local friend’s husband died Thursday.  I only found out yesterday.  I had only gotten to know the husband well enough to extremely miss him–but my sadness over what my friend is going through is worse.  I spent a lot of time with her yesterday, but my ability at brightening the bereaved is pretty poor.  I think I distracted her at least a little.

Entry 129 — More Futzing Around at Paint Shop

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

This is here not as a finished product but as a sketch to remind me to make something decent of it when I’m in better shape mentally.

Entry 128 — Vispo Sketches

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Well, I’m trying to get back on track but having a tough time of it.  I had ideas while taking hours to get to sleep last night, most of them variations on the idea my “sleep” poem is based on (which I’m pretty sure I stole from Marton).  So I tried one of them out at Paint Shop and had all kinds of trouble.  The first is the upper one below.  I intended it merely as the first step from my “sleep” poem to a new poem but liked what it did, so left it as a variation.  Minor but satisfactory.  I don’t like the one under it.  One error is the font of the central “gh.”  I don’t know how it got there.  I’m too worn out to change it, which (for me) would be more involved than you might suspect.  So I consider it a rough draft.  I no longer know whether to bother fixing it.  Nonetheless, it’s a Major Accomplishment compared to just about everything else I’ve been doing these past twelve months or so.  And it and its companion got me a third consecurive daily blog entry!  Whee.

Entry 125 — My Latest Slump

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

I’ve been in and out of my Null Zone quite a bit of late, and for the past few days have been extremely in it.   No zip, at all.  I want to sleep but am barely able to–it takes me four or five hours to get to sleep at night, and I can’t sleep past six or seven.  Even with a sleeping pill–or two.  Ambiens?  Something like that.  The lowest dosage.

Maybe my trouble sleeping is why I liked the visual poem below of mine so much when I came across it earlier today while looking for a sonnet-related visual poem of mine for use in a presentation on sonnets I’m scheduled to give at the local writers’ center in a little over a week and can’t seem to work on for more than ten or fifteen minutes a day.

I may need my dosage of synthroid, the medicine I take for hypothyroidism, increased.  I’m sure I’m suffering depression, too: one of my two brothers recently died.   Visiting him for a week, then returning for three or four days for his funeral was one of the reasons for so few recent entries here.

Apologies for this doleful entry, but I wanted you few who come here upon occasion to know what’s going on, especially you few I’ve told I expected to write about an artwork of yours here by now.

Now that I’ve gotten going, I might as well make an announcement: the issue of The Pedestal with the gallery of artworks John M. Bennett and I  edited for The Pedestal will be published tomorrow (at www.thepedestalmagazine.com), according to our editor, John Amen.  We expect the usual flak about it.  I just want to say all the wrong choices were John’s.  And that I prefaced it with a ringing undorsement of calling textual designs visual poetry.  Which John’s preface countered, but we’re still pals.

Isn’t it amazing?  No matter how null I get, I retain my acerbic wit.

Another announcement: if I ever get even slightly energetic, I’m going to post a few of the works submitted to the gallery that didn’t make it into the gallery but that I liked; John says he might like to post a few of his favorites that didn’t make it, too.  We also plan to have a gallery containing just about all the works submitted.  It will go up at Spidertangle.net 1 August.   I thought it’d be extremely informative for people to see what was submitted.  We won’t post anything without the submitters’ permission, and have been turned down by three, so far.  The same number so far have granted permission.

More, eventually, I very much hope.

Entry 119 — Defining Visual Poetry Again

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

In a month or so, John Bennett’s and my selection for a gallery of visual poems in The Pedestal should be appearing.  John and I each will be providing a preface for it, as I understand it.  In any case, I started thinking about mine last night.  Once again I returned to my obsession with defining “visual poetry.”  This time, though, I wasn’t concerned with my main definitional obsession, the requirement of visual poetry to contain words, but with a lesser obsession, the requirement that a visual poem be more than an illustrated poem, or poetically captioned illustration–because of an excellent submission I got consisting of several arresting visual images, each with a haiku running across its bottom.

Dogma#1: a visual poem must consist of a significant graphic element significantly interacting with a significant verbal element.  Dogma #2: a reader of the poem must experience the poem’s graphic and verbal elements simultaneously.  There will come a day when neurophysiologists will be able to detect this simultaneous experience.  Thereupon we will have an objective way of determining whether a not a given work is a visual poem–for a given person.

This simultaneous experience seems to me the whole point of visual poetry, difficult though it be to provide it.   My “Nocturne” demonstrates how it is done, so that’s the poem I’ll be using as my “Editor’s Poem” for the gallery.  It’s based on the simple idea of dotting all the letters in “night” to suggest stars, then doing the same with “voice” to indicate a voice with stars in it.  Very sentimental, but a favorite of mine.  For some reason, though, I can’t find it in my computer files, so apparently have not yet saved it digitally.

collage « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘collage’ Category

Entry 1311 — Time & Again, First & Last

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

Here are the title page of Carol Stetser’s Time & Again and its final two pages:

FirstPage

Pages7&8

Quite a richly concentrated historian of the West, I’d say.

.

Entry 1310 — Time Again Again

Wednesday, December 25th, 2013

The third pair of pages from Carol Stetser’s Time Again:

Pages5&6

Pssst: Merry Christmas, everyone!

.

Entry 1300 — Carol Stetser’s Time Again

Sunday, December 15th, 2013

The first two pages in Carol Stetser’s Time Again:

Pages1&2

Each wonderful as a stand-alone, but look how beautifully they work together!

.

Entry 1038 — Back to Spence/Topel

Sunday, March 10th, 2013

Back to this collage by Pete Spence and remixer Andrew Topel–mainly to get another entry out of the way without much work, but also to provide . . . an insight:

REMIX1topelSpence

I’m a bit more out of it even than usual because of stupid daylight savings, but also because yesterday I had to put in a lot of worrisome work on the latest installment of my Scientific American guest blog that kept me up past my bedtime.  The entry is here.

One interesting thing about it that I think will amuse those who have been following my career here and at New-Poetry the entry’s mention of a poem by none other than Rita Dove (inclusion of the full text of her poem would probably have cost too much)–and I praise it inordinately! I really didn’t want to do a favor for such an exemplar of all I’m against in the poetry scene, but I loved the poem! What can I say?

A thought out of nowhere: it occurred to me while thinking about creative person’s apparent susceptibility to bipolarism in some form or another that I was a “lifetime-phase” manic-depressive in that I was in my manic phase–relatively high-energy and confident–self-despising in a manic way, by which I mean I was angry with myself not sad about myself, and that I went into my depressed phase around sixty, aided no doubt by being hit with prostate cancer at 57, and have since been always tired, except when I’ve taken my zoom-dose (hydrocodone plus caffeine).   My thyroid conked out along the way.  My theory: that I used up my endocrine system due to my mania, leaving me unable to generate any kind of energy without the help of drugs.  I’m exaggerating, I’m certain, but I think there may be more than a little truth in what I’m saying.

Okay, now for the insight I’m sure you’ve been impatiently awaiting.  I take the Spence/Topel work to be a wonderful evocation of mathematical voyaging which begins, for me with the t’s, the famed symbol of “time,” and here forming plus-signs–and arrows helping the two actual arrows in the piece (and the triangle) represent the directive character of mathematics this piece involves, but leading away from the voyage as time approaches zero.  The voyage, it is quickly apparent, begins at the bottom with the hand-drawn X the voyage seems being taken to determine the “N” of. which, we see, is rather regally exotic.  Decimal points, e’s for energy, and 2 c’s for constants along the way, but with the triangle in opposition, and another arrow to remind us (energetically) of the incompleteness of the solution we’re headed toward, as does the separating equals-sign near the arrow’s head.  An exciting map–of a fully dimensional adventure, for me, because of the 2 and the 7, which combine to equal 3 cubed.

The interpretation I just unspooled is unquestionably subjective.  I offer it merely to indicate where one person let the work take him–based with a fair amount of reason on what’s there in the work.  I hope it also suggests that the work, for being able to suggest so much–the voyage a mathematical attempt to solve something can be–the work is a superior one.  It should inspire other interpretations, some entirely different, but none inconsistent in some general way with mine.

.

Entry 1037 — Spence/Topel Collaborations

Saturday, March 9th, 2013

These are the first two pieces in Remix, a little booklet published by avantacular press that Andrew Topel just sent me:

REMIX1topelSpence

REMIX2topelSpence

They are collages by Pete Spence that have been remixed by Andrew.
.

Entry 71 — A Broadside from the Past

Monday, January 11th, 2010

.

I’m pretty sure this resulted from some contact I made in Chicago when there for an underground press conference.  Not sure when that was.  Maybe fifteen years ago. . .  I’ve since lost touch with everyone named on the page.  I do remember Ashley as a good kid and valuable undergrounder.