Pill-Popping « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Pill-Popping’ Category

Entry 1471 — A Tweet?

Saturday, May 31st, 2014

The Following is from my diary entry for today.  Have my blog entries now sunk to the level of tweets?

I took my now-standard zoom-dose (a caffeine pill and a hydrocodone pill) a little while ago and am now (11 A.M.) feeling pretty good.  My Civilization game is going well, I finally won two straight games of Hearts when playing it around seven, and just got a string of 11 straight FreeCell wins going.  What more could a boy want?  I’m going to go through my essay on Beauty methodically now.  I need a unifying principle.  I also need something to write about in my blog entry for the day.  Something will come.  “Off to the races!” I think, then recall my father, who—in similar circumstances, albeit quotidian, like starting off on a car trip, not of High Importance like mine—would have said the same thing.  Maybe for my blog I’ll talk about how nice it was of God to make cats for us, but how vile of him to leave so many of us with no parents to show off in front of when we finally make it—or even, as now, happily think we may.  I truly believe I’ll be able to sell this essay to someone if I can just get it right.  That means smooth, right now.  Okay, now—really—off to the races.  (Hey, I think I just wrote my blog entry.)

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1414 — Azoom

Saturday, April 5th, 2014

Prologue, from my diary entry for 4 April 2014: “In five minutes it will be 2 o’clock.  I, as usual, don’t feel like writing anything.  I can’t think of anything to write.  So, I’m going to give the small zoom-dose a big test.  I haven’t taken one for five or more days.  I will take it at two and see what it makes me write.  I will start with my blog entry for the day, and just write any old thing if nothing else occurs to me.”

My small zoom-dose consists of half of one of my hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-660 tablets and a caffeine pill supposed to be the equivalent of a cup of coffee (but I can’t remember a cup of coffee doing much for me–probably because the few I’ve had, have been more than half cream  [I never developed a taste for it]).  If I’m addicted to it, I must be a weird addict be cause I avoid taking one as much as I can–just the way I avoid all forms of work!

It seems to be working.  The brilliant title of this entry was the first indication of that.  But I’ll consider it a failure if it doesn’t get me writing something of importance to me, like one of the many reviews I need to get done for Small Press Review.  Or my July/August SPR column.  Maybe that.  It should be easy, for it’s just a continuation of my previous one, a review of a Seattle zine from 25 years ago called Skyviews that I barely got begun, thanks to my introductory remarks.  (Note: it’s 2:22 and I’m already zinging along happily.  But haven’t whirred very close to anything I can use my mood to spout megalomaniacal huzzahs about.  Unless it’s that sentence.  [Note-within-a-note: when I’m in my pharmaceutically-aided zone, I constantly remember friends high on mary j. in my younger days who thought themselves aflow with creativity that I saw no sign of, and wonder if that’s where I am; but I later like what I’ve done.  Biggest symptom is gushfulness–as soon as I finish a sentence, another suggests itself–or several do.  I veer into what I think are either clever or witty asides.  I feel confident, though, that that is what I am at my best, and that dues to old age, I need pills {most of the time} to get there.]  There–proof that I have not gone excessively linguoblivious: I just closed every one of my parenthesized parenthetical expressions.  And now closet this one>)!  Stagoo!

I strongly suspect that the ability to produce yelps of triumph is one of our innate mechanisms.  And with that my zoom seems to have ended.  I have nothing more to say!   453 words only to this point.  But my zoom has not entirely ended: I don’t care!  However many words I’ve done is enough!  Stagoo!

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1389 — “Cerebrogovernance”

Tuesday, March 4th, 2014

Yeah, another coinage, this one finishing off my full definition of the “G-factor” (or, in my psychology, general cerebreffectiveness component–or full-scale intelligence as opposed to what most credentialed psychologists consider it) as a combination of four cerebral mechanisms: charactration, accommodance, accelerance and–now–cerebrogovernance.  Mechanism in charge of basal cerebral energy level; mechanism in charge of reducing cerebral energy level; mechanism in charge of increasing cerebral energy; and supervisory mechanism in charge of directing cerebral energy (which is effectually the same as directing attention) to and from various awarenesses (or areas of the cerebrum such as the auditory or verbal awarenesses–e.g., the cerebrogovernance might turn off all the awarenesses of a person silently reading except his verbal awaresness and verbal/visual and verbal auditory association areas, then switch him out of all three to his auditory awareness if someone suddenly screams his name).

I think of cerebrogovernance as “little g” and all four cerebreffective mechanisms “big G.”  All the major awarenesses are “big S’s” (for big specific “intelligences”), and their many sub-awarenesses (e.g., the reducticeptual awareness’s matheceptual and linguaceptual sub-awarenesses) are “little s’s.”

I’m gearing up for a Major little essay on my theory of cerebreffective- ness.  But, first I have to finish the first blog entry to the continuation of my Scientific American blog.  I’ve almost finished it, honest, but I keep finding spots to repair, delete or expand, and seem to be avoid what I believe is the thing’s final section (where I went off on a tangent about tragedy, then realized what I had to say about it was too confuse to try to add to my entry).

Meanwhile, I had my cystoscopy.  It went very well, but my problem turned out to be due to a bladder stone the doctor couldn’t removed for some reason so I’ll have to go back next Monday for, I guess, a similar procedure to remove it.  Will find out more Thursday.  Meanwhile, I’ll have to endure another week of sometimes painful difficulty urinating.  Right now I’m in a good mood, though–even though I’m not on hydrocodone.

Speaking of that, I just read in the paper that I’m a hydrocodone-abuser because I sometimes take “just to feel better”–instead, apparently, for a headache back-ache or the like that other pain remedies don’t do much for, which is what my hydrocodone was prescribed for.  It’s so stupid.  A person semi-incapacitated because of a headache should be given a pill but a person unable to do anything that will give his life meaning because he’s in the kind of null zone I get into at times should not be given a pill–unless, I gather, worse off than I am.

My doctor can no longer prescribe the dosage of Hydrocodone he used to, so my latest prescription from him is for half the dosage.  A little silly, since it only means I have to take two pills instead of one to get the effect one was giving me.  I’m going to see how the half-dosage works, though.  I suspect I don’t really need any dosage; I think I only need the caffeine pills.  But who knows, I may end up seeing a shrink to get genuine anti-depressive pills, legitimately.

Of course, the thing that most disgusts me is that I’m not allowed to buy the pills from anyone who wants to sell them to me without a prescription, and take them as I see fit, on the grounds that I should make all final decisions about my body.  Which, of course, could include my decision to put one of my doctors in charge of my thyroid gland, for instance, as I’ve done.

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 884 — Ruminations on Caffeine Plus a Brush-Burr

Sunday, October 7th, 2012

I’ve now had two caffeine-boosted days in a row.  Once again, I’m into what looks to be a null day.  I can’t think of anything it’d be worth taking a caffeine pill, with or without a part-opium pain pill, to work on.  I’d very much prefer not taking anything, but I have so much to do.  So, drug-dependent Bobby has just taken both pills at 11:19 A.M. e.s.t. this 7 October 2012.  

It seems, according to an Internet site, that caffeine is an Once in the brain, the principal mode of action is “a nonselective antagonist of adenosine receptors”–it connects to these receptors, in the process blocking adensonie from them.  Since it has no affect on the receptors, they keep doing what you do, which seems to be keeping us awake, and boosting our apparent and actual energy, so we feel good and work hard.  Adenosine clamps down on wakefulness and energy.  It seems to me a life-extender inasmuch as it slows you down, keeping you from over-doing anything.  I’m sure my adenosine got too influential, I’m not sure why.  I may be that I got to drinking too much Mountain Dew, the caffeine content of which shut down so many adenosine receptors that my body manusfactured a huge number too many of them in compensation.  This is why drugs generally end increasing whatever problem they at first helped one with.  I hope old age is the culprit, screwing me up by intentionally slowing me down, and went too far.  In any case, I may well be headed toward a state in which now amount of caffeine can help me.  My dosage at the moment is pretty low, though–the quivalent of two cups of mosts kinds of coffee.  I don’t see that I have any alternative. 

Well, maybe I do: maybe there some way to poison my adenosine receptors and whatever mechanism builds new ones.  The probable problem with that is that creativity requires wakefulness followed by null zones during which one accumulates necessary new data. . . .

Hey, here’s something else asemic by Nancy Brush-Burr so you’ll get something out of this entry:

 

 

 

While waiting for this image to upload, I thought to myself what a wonderful good deed I was doing for nbb (with whom I’ve exchanged a few letters and/or e.mails but don’t know well–and am wondering if we are distant cousins, the Burr family being prominent in my genealogy [but Aaron is off to the side!]) by giving her work space here and making my everlastingly insightful comments on.  Up there on my peak, I credited her with deserving this favor.  From there my mind went to amusement on the way my drugs bring out my megalomania.  At once, I smiled at myself, observing that I was a megalmonai even without drugs, the difference being that with drugs I am a happy megalomaniac, without them an unhappy one.  A weird kind of manic-depressive, or so I’ve long believed.  Never darkening enough to overcome my instinct to stay alive, nor glistening Sol-levelly enough to go confront Obama in person for not shoveling a few billion of his pay-offs to the 47% to me.

Enough of me (if only for 2.3 minutes): this visimage of Nancy Brush-Burr’s is an absolutely zowwy picture of –hey, maybe my very own communicative excitement at times!  Not a poem, just a terrific representation of language thunder-storming into something glorious.

.

 

Entry 681 — Why I Like Long Division Poetry

Sunday, March 11th, 2012

I think six people have now seen and commented on my Sequences.  17 in all have seen it, if the counter involved is only counting each person’s first visit.  The only slightly negative comment about it came from the one of the very few who made any meaningful comment on it, Endwar, who said he wasn’t all that taken with long division.  Which, I (Moon in Aries!) instantly responded to with a phooey directed at him followed by a description of (some of) my feelings about long division poems: “I don’t think of any of my long divisions as division, but one multiplication and one addition.  I love the idea of objects or images multiplying each other.  Also the complication of the metaphor resulting: the metaphor having three parts: the multiplier, the multiplicand and the process of multiplication.  My long division poems also bring me back to how wonderful I thought the process of long division was when I was first exposed to it.”

I also commented that my long divisions are much more poetic than conceptual, and Endwar leans more to the poeticoceptual than to the conceptipoetic.  As I’m sure I’ve mused before, I feel many people in science (like Endwar although this may not apply to him), are too conceptual to be able to break out of their analytical minds enough to flow into the weirdwhere my long divisions bobble into.

Ha, they may need the mix of APCs and opiated pain pills I sometimes take.  I say that because I took such a mix just twenty minutes ago after being dead-headedly uncreative for a week or more–and look how “creative” my weiords bobbled at the end of the previous sentence.  The lilt up into poeticonceptuality.  Actually, with me, it is an ascent into an energy level sufficient to express whatever poeticonceptuality I have–but others not naturally in the zone may well be helped by such a mix into it.  So, require visitors to my exhibts and readers of my books to take a dose prior to engaging my work?

Meanwhile, the mix continues working on me.  It’s got me into my semi-megalomaniacal zone. “Semi,” because I’m aware that I’m in it, or at least enough aware of my readers to pretend to think I’m in it when IT IS NOT ANY KIND OF MANIA FOR ME TO RECOGNIZE THAT I AM TO JEHOVAH WHAT HE IS TO KOOL-AID JONES.  I do get hilarious when in the zone, don’t I!  Anyway, as I was about to say, I once again wonder why hardly anyone bothers with writings of mine like this one.  So many others have large audiences for similar reflections whose plod is way lower than the deft snipper of mine.  Okay, I’m not quite a Thoreau or Emerson (the first two I can think of whom I hope have contributed to what I try for with my poetic prose–Robert Frost another), but surely, I keep believing (even when not in my possibly megalomaniacal zone, the difference being that I keep my belief to myself then), I’m close enough to them often enough to attract the attention of people who like that kind of writing more than I do.

Two possibilities: I’m more wildly out-of-phase with the zeitgeist than I feel I am–or I’m too boring repeating a long-dead zeitgeist.  I can’t tell, which is why I so much wish I could get feedback from my few readers.  But they are all as creatively other-occupied as I, who rarely am able to critique them!  What I need are academics, and academics are academics because they are innately behind and want to stay there–who can’t not stay there.

I just made up a new category for entries like this one: “Autobiosophy.”  Words about my, uh, wisdom, rather than words about me.  I feel I write a lot more about my thoughts than I do about me, a good reason for my claim that I ain’t no narcissiphist.  Another argument of mine against the latter tag, which has been applied to me, is that I don’t worship myself, I am aware of and point out flaws of mine all the time.  I am balancedly ego-postive and ego-negative.  Or so it seems to me. 

I could go on forever but will try to do it taking care of the reviewing I’m behind on.  Wish me luck.  You needn’t wish me contentedness: the pills have me ridiculously content with the whole universe.

.

Entry 540 — My Urethra

Saturday, October 22nd, 2011

I betcha this  entry draw thousands of visitors!  What a compelling title!  What a fascinating topic! 

So, what’s going on?  What’s going on is I’m going to have an in&out urethra procedure carried out this coming Friday.  My surgeon will be using a laser to remove a calcium build-up that’s been giving me urinary problems.  He believes the radiactive seeds I was implanted with twelve or so years ago for prostate cancer caused the build-up. 

Why am I telling you this?  To explain why I’ve been so listless of late, and will be for a while.  I’ve been told not to take any aspirins until I’ve had and recovered from the procedure–to prevent excessive bleeding.  APCs, apparently my only source of zip, is part aspirin, so I can’t take them.

In spite of my listlessness, I have the book for Marton half done.  Two days ago I felt I needed a break from it, so pulled out the chapters I want to add to my book on the Shakespeare authorship question to work on.  It took me a full day to remember what I intended to do, and find the files I had done.  What I want to do is important: it’s to make my explanation of the anti-Shakespeare conspiracy theory thebasis of a general explanation of all conspiracy theories.  I’m hoping that will increase the salability of the book–although I think it important to do, anyway.  I may have all the ideas I need but organizing them is a bear.  And I’s so weary.

 

 

 

.

Entry 509 — A Good Month So Far

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

If I count 31 August as part of September, I’ve come up with 9 new mathemaku in September.  Nine poems in a month isn’t much of an output for most poets, but it’s very good for me.    Actually I only have final copies of four or five, but the others are essentially finished.  I also have essentially have all the terms I jotted down in May for another that have to be written out the way I want them (many in cursive) and backgrounded, and notes for one or two others that are fairly complete.

I wrote the above last night.  It’s now around ten in the morning of the twenty-first of September and once again I’m high on drugs–2 APCs and one tablet of the pain pill with opium that I use on occasion.  As always, I find it unbelievable that a little bit of some chemical or chemicals could make such a difference in me.  I took them because I’m so far behind in my struggle to keep up with the things in my life I consider important, like my next column for Small Press Review, I feel I can’t come close to catching up without chemical help.  (The column, by the way, is now two columns–I did manage to pump far more than enough words into it over the past weeks, but at way too slow a rate, even with the occasional help of my pills.)

I’ll talk over what I’m doing to my body with my gp next time I see him, which should be in three months.  I fear I’ll reach a point at which time the chemicals no longer help me.  I’m concerned, but not as concerned, that I’ll have a heart attack or go crazy–although my usage is not at all high.  Bottom line: I’d rather have three or four more years high than twenty without the pills, or something else that can get me where they get me or close to it.  I can’t say it enough: they astonish me every time.   Without them, I’m almost a car with no gas in its tank; with them, I can operate. 

So, it’s Grumman with his APCs and opium, Leary with his LSD, Freud with his cocaine and tobacco, Coleridge with his opium (Keats used it a bit, too, I believe, even before his tuberculosis), just about all the prominent American authors of the first half of the twentieth century and their alcohol, Balzac and his coffee . . .  Many others.  There are negative examples, too, such as Shaw (one of my greatest heroes) and his abstinence . . . and failure to ascend beyond wonderfully crisp and logical prose to poetry.   The only drug-free artist of the first order I can think of was Shelley–if he indeed was.  

It bothers me that I seem to need drugs no matter how many others in my field did, and regardless of the fact that human beings owe their place in the scheme of things to their being able to improve themselves significantly with external aids (why should we go along with the use of spiked shoes for athletes, say, but not steroids?)  My output is probably no more increased by the drugs I take than by the computer I use.  Still . . .

I am aware of certain negatives in the pill-popping life–lack of focus.  It is hard for me to leave this entry, for example.   Once I’ve managed it, I’ll have trouble choosing the right project to tackle next.  I believe, too, that my critical sense suffers.   No matter.   I will now go to the SPR  column-become-columns and finish them.   (Tarzan yell I’m not sure how to spell here, nor can I execute decently, although I do attempt to.)

Entry 482 — Different Knowings

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

I’ve often mammered here about the effect of pain pills on me.  Recently I’ve taken the one with an opium derivative in it and two APC’s.  The caffeine in the latter may help me.  The two drugs together allow me to act.  I have always found this extremely weird.  The most interesting thing about it (for me), though, is how always it reveals two of my many ways of knowing things to me.   Various portions of what I call my reducticeptual awareness tell me that all these pills do is give me a little extra stimulator-chemicals, or precursors to those–more dopamine, perhaps.  Or less whatever chemical in my brain is inhibiting me.  Simple neurophysiology.

The rest of my awarenesses will never understand this.  How can my brain be so helpless?  How can it sit in my head or do whatever it does wherever it is in me or near me and perceive me at my keyboard unable to type a single simple word that will get me going into a blog entry like this–until, ZING, Mr. Happy Pill and his wife come aboard and say, “Let the dolt type.”

Don’t tell me about placebos.   I don’t seem suggestible.  Marijuana never worked on me, for instance.  Nor chiropractry.  I wanted both to.  Ditto valium that a doctor once gave me for the dead-headedness I’ve experienced on and off for forty years.   Certain remedies for allergies failed while others worked, at least for a time. 

Ah, but I have been suggestible.  A few days after I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, my arms started to ache and became weak; I couldn’t lift them above my head.  My gp at the time, Dr. Hollinger, checked me out and told me he though I was experiencing an anxiety attack.  My symptoms almost immediately disappeared.  I didn’t bother getting the tranquilizer he prescribed for me. 

Still, it was ultimately neurophysiological.  My brain-cells were frantically trying to make new connections to deal with the extreme blow to my self-esteem getting cancer had given me, not to mention the fear of death it got started in me.  It broke down.  I haven’t studied medicine enough to know the details of what happened, but I don’t think my layman’s guess that the brain shifted too much attention from the normal working of my body, particularly in this case my arms, to dealing with the cancer crisis.  So my fundaceptual awareness wasn’t getting enough data to run my arms right.   More important, my execuceptual awareness didn’t have the energy to make my arms move properly–lift when necessary, for example. 

All kinds of distress would occur when they didn’t lift when they normally would, automatically.  Ergo, anxiety and further breakdowns.  Whereupon, my analytical intelligence multiplied the bad effect hugely by telling me I was going to drop dead.  After all, prostate cancer plus the beginnings of paraplegia. 

The simple reassurance my doctor gave me cancelled the anxiety.  I suspect that the relief I felt to hear the cancer hadn’t spread to my armpits, or whatever I feared, upped my endorphins as much as the pills I’m now taking do.  And the good effect held long enough form my brain to work out an effective way to deal with my changed circumstances. 

I took aspirins fairly regularly for headaches, some awfully bad, I thought, between the ages of eight and twelve.  The stress of dealing with people, I’m sure, was at the bottom of it.  Going to school, going to choir practice, things like that.  I don’t remember getting headaches during summer vacations when there was no school or choir practice. 

As I’ve written before, I spontaneously gave up headaches one day in the seventh grade when I vividly remember going down the stairs in the school and knowing that I was over my need for aspirins.  I remember nothing else.  Perhaps I had a headache and I’d suddenly told it to go away and it did.  Or maybe I just realized I hadn’t had a headache for quite a while.  Maybe I’d just experienced something that ordinarily would have given me a headache and it didn’t (although I had no cognitive theory as to why I had them, so could only have guessed I’d had an experience that should have given me one intuitively).  Anyway, I only had headaches a few times a year from then on–except when hung-over, as I occassionally was during my early thirties, when I occasionally went bar-hopping.

I forgot something in my pill-propelled paragraphs above: my bad eyes.  Too much reading, especially without enough light, and perhaps without exactly the right prescription lenses, probably contributed some to my susceptibility to headaches.

Final musing: that I’ve run out of natural endorphins, or a proper supply of them, due to how much I did use them over the years, often going close to genuine mania as a creative artist and thinker.  I keep thinking I shouldn’t use them now, I should let my endocrine system rebuild itself, without pharmaceutical interference.  But it might take too much time.  There’s also the fact that my thyroid gland doesn’t work the way it should anymore (which may well be due to my having been hyperthyroidal most of my life, which was responsible for what I like to think of as my genius, until the overwork the poor gland was doing finally caused it to have a breakdown).

Okay.  It’s six in the evening at this point.  I more or less did my duty as a physical therapy patient.  A forty-minute session at the center I go to.  The bike ride to and from.   A third of my home exercises–but I need only do half of them when I go to the center.  I should have done more but I was too worn out to.  I didn’t take the pills till a couple of hours ago.

I took care of one email this morning.  I got one or two more Small Press Review columns posted in the Pages section here.  (I have to boast, by the way, that I now have 82 columns there.  Four years more of them to go.  I feel proud of them–and did so even pilllessly.  They’re nothing compared with what I might have done–and have occasionally done here and elsewhere–but I continue not to understand, acognitively since my intellect understands, in what way they are inferior to the literary commentary of those getting national attention).

New subject, because of the remarks I’ve made above concerning my True Value to World-Culture.  As I may have said, now that I’m seventy, I’ve decided to be fully honest. I believe one of the things that has me on the margins is lack of social aggressiveness. I believe it’s what kept me from playing varsity basketball in high school, too.

Long story. Maybe I should save it till tomorrow. I have more pills.

Entry 449 — Pill-Popping

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

Many times in the past, I’ve spoken of the pain pills I’ve taken, or the Mountain Dew I’ve drunk, often noting how one of the other, or both, have helped me out of the Null Zone.  For at least four weeks I almost entirely avoided either.  Once or twice taking a four-hour pain pill before trying to play tennis on my painfully bad left leg.  I think in that time I was never fully out of the null zone, and probably half the time close to fully in it.

Well, I finally decided that I’m a hopeless addict.  Proof is that I took two APCs, which have caffeine, a bit over two hours ago, then a pain pill with an opium-derivative in it a half-hour or so ago, and have done better work since the APCs on the important essay I’ve been slogging through for over a month than I have since beginning it.  And I feel like I can do a full day’s work on it.  Maybe more!

Once back home after the hip replacement operation I’ll be having (in a week), I plan to find some expert on my kind of drug addiction, and find out if I can somehow stay out of the null zone (a reasonable amount of the time) without drugs.  If not, no big deal so long as I can keep having them prescribed for me, and I’m pretty sure I can.  If it costs me a few years of life, so what?  To continue to live as I’ve been living the past month of so would be ridiculous.  In any case, it looks like I’ll have my essay done before I go into the hospital.

I’m feeling very good about it (and was even while in the null zone).  It’s really coming together nicely.  As usual when I’m knocking out material I have a good opinion of, I sing my way into fantasies of finally gaining recognition.  One thing for sure, this time I’m going to keep on the attack with this essay until it is, or I am, done.

Meanwhile, what have I learned from my life that I can pass on to others?  Nothing.  I truly don’t know whether to advise the young to avoid caffeine and pain pills, or to consider them seriously if their energy levels are not as high as they feel they need to be for a satisfying life.  Maybe some people are born with a need for pharmaceutical help, or with a flawed endocrine system that will eventually require it as I eventually required synthroid for my thyroid deficiency.  Or was that caused by a use of caffeine that caused my thyroid to overwork and wear out?  All I can say is that I hope genetic research will finally tell people enough about what they’ve been born with for them to make intelligent decisions about questions like these.  If their genes have given them the capacity to make intelligent decisions.  I don’t think mine did, I don’t think mine would have allowed me to choose suicide at the age of 15 or 24, the two ages at which it would have been best for me to do that.

 

 

 

Entry 628 — New Vocational Triumphs « POETICKS

Entry 628 — New Vocational Triumphs

Just when I thought my visual poetry career was going nowhere, I had a pleasant surprise at an Arts & Humanities gathering last night.  It was an annual affair where local visimagists get together with people representing public places.  The latter look over the works brought to the event, three pieces per artist, and offer exhibition space to those whose work they like.  A bank lobby, for instance.  I went to one of these long ago, but my work wasn’t chosen, and while I’m (probably insanely)  persistant at continuing to make art, I have just about no stick-to-it-ive-ness so far as getting it to where people can see it and maybe like it.  Well, with the encouragement of Olivia and Judy, of the Arts & Humanities Council, and thinking maybe now that I had my current exhibition, someone might think me worthy of another elsewhere, I brought the following three pieces to the main library, where the affair was:

 

 

 

 

I was going for accessibility with the top two.  I added the bottom one to show a little of what I was doing with long division and color.  In any case, I’m now down for three more exhibitions, two more this year and one in 2013. 

I got to talk with fellow artists, too.  One of them did abstract-expressionist stuff with the word, “love,” embedded in them–another local visual poet!  I came across another artist who uses some kind of transparent, screenlike fabric in her work: she paints an image on it and hangs it in front of regular fabric with a background painted on it.  I thought it worked really well, and have vague ideas on what I might do with it.  So, quite a good hour or so!

.

One Response to “Entry 628 — New Vocational Triumphs”

  1. marton koppany says:

    Good news. Congratulations, Bob!

Leave a Reply

Entry 532 — A New Conquest by Math Poetry « POETICKS

Entry 532 — A New Conquest by Math Poetry

Yesterday I posted “A Page for Mrs. Lasher’s Class” after a teacher in San Antonio e.mailed me that she had introduced her elementary schoolchildren to mathematical poetry, using one of mine as a demonstration specimen.  Very nice to get the e.mail.  My problem is that I always over-react to such things: just about as soon as I’d read the e.mail, I was organizing a tour of the nation’s elementary schools, and picking poems I’d present and speak about.  I got over that quickly enough.  I’m in friendly contact with Mrs. Lasher, and do expect to do other things with her and her classes.  They have a slide show of their poems up at http://blogs.neisd.net/dlashe.  I hope to comment on them–but, yow, how difficult it is (again, although I feel moderately chipper) to get myself started on what should not be all that hard.  In fact, it should be fun, and contribute toward the book of and about pluraesthetic poetry I’ve always had it in the back of my brain to put together (and have occasionally written short pieces I thought might go into such a books, including a Powerpoint Presentation of one of my full-scale visio-mathematical poems, which has been one of the recent jobs I started then dropped during the past month or so.

It’s around ten in the morning as I write this, by the way.  I just took two APCs and a pain pill with some opiate in it to see if it would help.  First time in a week or so I’ve fallen off the wagon.  I’ll be very upset with myself if I don’t get anything  done.  I think the boost is beginning: I’m now going to write a reply to a letter from Jody Offer I should have gotten off to her three weeks or more ago.  I can use what I’ve typed above for part of it!  Without double-use, I don’t think I’d ever get anything done!  Almost all my poems start with, or or significantly advanced, by scraps from earlier poems (used or discarded), or other people’s poems.  My letter will also repeat the one letter I did get done this week–to Arnold Skemer.

Wow, now I’[m excited about something I should be excited about–although it’s one more bit of evidence how backward I am: I found I hadn’t saved my letter to Arnold so found the hard copy of it I had saved, meaning to copy it–with my typing fingers.  Then I remembered seeing “OCR” in conjunction with my new printer/scanner, and how it had then occurred to me that my scanner might be able to convert printed text to a computer file.  So I tried it and it did!  As I expect everyone reading this will have known.  It’d really be terrific if it worked with cursive texts but I doubt that it would.  I’d love to convert my old diary entries to a computer file.  My diary is incredibly boring but does have a few items of interest.  I’ve always wondered if it had enough such items for any kind of autobiographical sketch long enough to be worth doing.  Other than that, I could search it for various trips I’ve made when wanting its date or the like.  I could not bear reading through them to find something like that.

Gah, I got so excited about scanning my diary pages that I jumped and went to the file drawer I’d had them in for fifteen or more years.  Naturally, they were not there.  I’d organized them to who-knows-where.  I was going to test one. 

How I wish I could get ten or fifteen of my visual poetry friends like Geof to visit me and go through my house to find out exactly what was where–or maybe just Geof, because he’d love to do it.

 * * * *  It’s now noon, and I have written a letter.  The day will not be a complete wipe-out.

 .

Leave a Reply

Entry 1201 — The Obversopher « POETICKS

Entry 1201 — The Obversopher

Yesterday I came up with another new word, “obversopher,” for “opposite of versosopher.”  A propagandist is an obversopher who wants his understanding of some belief system to triumph whether true or not.  An obtusopher is an obversopher who wants his understanding of some belief system to triumph in spite of its invalidity because he truly fails to realize it is invalid.  A verosophers wants the truth to triumph regardless of whether it validates some belief system of his or not.

I’m confused about the book I thought I was going to write about propagandism.  The above is part of my flounder to find a Unifying Principle for it.

I need a list of propagandistic techniques and of examples of obtusophical irrationality.  I probably should list everything that could possibly be on either list then get them appropriately organized.  Wishlexia.  Varieties of distraction.  Use of logical fallacies.  Cherry-Picking.  Insults.  Decontextualization.

Nothing more today.  Earlier an important external hard drive crashed and I lost two hours taking it to Staples to have it looked at.  My data may be retrievable, but I won’t find out for at least another six hours.  I was worried that I’d lost many good graphic images.  The drive had been for back-ups, but I’d begun using it as my only storage place for a lot of stuff–because I feared a computer crash, not an external drive crash.  Very stupid.  But lucky, for most of the data on the drive was (as I finally remembered after not finding it anywhere on any of my computers) from another external drive of mine, and most everything else recent was on a flash drive that I use to take things from my main computer to the one I use for my blog.  But now a thunderstorm is giving me trouble.  It zapped a half hour of work a few minutes ago.  So I want to get this posted right now.

.

Leave a Reply

Jody Offer « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Jody Offer’ Category

Entry 83 — MATO2, Chapter 1.05

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

About a week later I heard from one of my California writer friends, Moya Sinclair, who called me a little after eight in the evening sounding very cheerful and energetic.  She, Annie Stanton, quite a good linguexpressive poet, Diane Walker, well-known as a television actress under her maiden name, Brewster, who had literary ambitions and was quite bright but never to my knowledge broke beyond the talented dabbler stage, and I had been a few years earlier the main members of a little writers’ group at Valley Junior College in the San Fernando Valley presided over by Les Boston, a professor there.   Technically, we were doing independent studies with Dr. Boston, but in reality we friends who met weekly to discuss one another’s writing, mine at the time plays.  Annie and Diane were about ten years older than I, Moya close to eighty by the time of her phone call, and she was in a convalescent home.  Her circulatory system had slowly been wearing out.  I fear she died there, for I never heard from her again.  Both Annie and Diane died around then in their early sixties, huge unexpected losses for me.

Moya reported that Annie had been over for a visit and had left my book with her.  Moya said she’d been reading parts of it and found it beautifully written, etc.  She had a few adverse comments on it, too–on Geof’s word for one-word poem (“pwoermd”), for instance, but that was to be expected.  Moya, for years working on an autobiographical novel, was pretty wedded to the old standards.  We had a fine chat that boosted my spirits a good deal.  She represented one of the main kinds of readers I hoped would like my book.

A day later I got a very positive letter from Jack Moskovitz about my book, and a lukewarm one about it from Geof.  Geof, as I remember, felt I should have lightened up on the Grummaniacal coinages.  I think he was right.  I believe one of the things I tried to do in my two revisions of the book was to cut down on them.

The next day, according to my diary, I got lots of letters, mostly from people I sent my book to, and for the most part complimentary though Jody Offer, a California poet/playwright friend of mine, felt I got too advanced in parts–I’m sure in part because of my terminology.  I was finding out, though, that my book was not as geared for non-experts as I’d hoped.

Entry 353 — A Newly Revised Mathemaku « POETICKS

Entry 353 — A Newly Revised Mathemaku

Click the thumbnail below to get to one of my recent mathemaku, elaborately gussied up.  I spent a ridiculous amount of time on it at Paint Shop.  “Mathemaku in Praise of Reading, No. 1″:

I don’t like it.  It seems trivial to me.  I hope that’s because I’m in the ol’ null zone again, but I don’t think so.

Later note (8 P.M. 19 January): I’m feeling a bit better, mainly because I’m finally listening to records again after being without a local classical music station or a functioning phonograph or the money to buy many CDs for several years until getting a phonograph with software allowing me to transfer my records to my computer and thence, if I want, to CDs.  Tannhauser.  Also, I had a glass of Mountain Dew and it may have given me a boost.  In any case, I sat down and did half of my next column for Small Press Review.

I also came up with a retort to Geof’s recent comment that if you think you’re speaking for the truth, the game is already lost: if you are not concerned with speaking for the truth, the game will be too easy to win to be worth playing.



2 Responses to “Entry 353 — A Newly Revised Mathemaku”

  1. Geof Huth says:

    Truth is whatever cannot be believed.

  2. Bob Grumman says:

    What if I can’t believe your statement is the stupidest one I’ve ever read, Geof?

Leave a Reply

Stephen Russell « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Stephen Russell’ Category

Entry 811 — Monet & Minor News and Thoughts

Thursday, July 26th, 2012

Below is Monet’s Regatta at Argenteuil.  It’s from a calendar I’ve had hanging in my computer room for several years because I like it so much.  I now have a second interest in it: using it in one of my long division poems.  I want to do that because of an event the local visual arts center I belong to (which has a building where it has classes and puts on exhibitions, one of them a yearly national one, albeit none of them are what anyone would call close to the cutting edge) is sponsoring.  Many of its painters are painting copies of Monet works, and poets have been invited to submit poems about Monet works to be show with the paintings.  There is probably a reading, too.  I thought it would be amusing to submit one of my poems, and I’d love to be able to use Regatta at Argenteuil.  I have another couple of months I’ve just found out.  I thought I needed to get it done by August.  Which is why I scanned my copy of the painting a while ago, making it available for this entry, one more that I had nothing much else for.

.

I can’t think of anything to go with the painting.  I haven’t had very few ideas for the past three or four months, and none I was interested in to do more than jot down somewhere.  Last years bout this time I found out about a contest the magazine Rattle has every year.  One can submit up to 4 poems to it, and I knew it had published some visual poems at one time, so was inspired to make a set of four long division poems for the contest, four that I still think are among my best.  They never arrived because I didn’t put enough stamps on the envelope I sent them in, unaware of the latest cost of sending.  I wish I could try again–this deadline is 1 August–but no ideas.  And the poems have to be unpublished.  I should be saving poems for contests, especially for one like this that I know will occur yearly, but I tend either to post them here, or send them to the latest editors who have invited work from me.  Another problem for me is that I’m often unsure whether or not a particular poem of mine has appeared anywhere.  The main problem, of course, is that I’m so unprolific.  I could do a bunch of Poem poems at just about any time, I think, but I don’t consider them good for contests because so dependent on my main character, whom I believe hard to take to until exposed to a number of times.  If even then.

* * *
Since this is another of my extremely lackadaisical entries, here’s a post by Stephen Russell and my responses to it at New-Poetry:
.
My list would be a lot different, but yours at least is half unconventional. Also, I’d stay away from your title. I’d go with “My Favorite Poems of the Past 25 Years In English That I’m Familiar With.”
.
“By Others.” I feel sorry for any poet who doesn’t include many of his own poems among his favorites, however much he should realize how subjective his choice is.
.
Getting the dates right would be hard. I’d rather go with my favorite all-time poems.  Incredibly hard, though—like which of Stevens’s poems do I like best? I think to simplify, I’d limit myself to one poem per poet. Otherwise, 39 Stevenses and 38 Frosts. No Merwins or Ashberys, that’s for sure.
.
From: stephen russell
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 3:35 PM
To: NewPoetry List
Subject: Re: [New-Poetry] What Are the Best Poems of the Past 25 Years?
.
The Folding Cliffs, W.S. Merwin
(Epic poem about Hawaii.)
.
Deed, Rod Smith
(The title acts as an extended methaphor (or is that metaphor?)… for nation building).
.
Eunoia, Christian Bok.
The work that introduced univolics. At least I was introduced to the concept thanks to Bok.
.
(Neither his work (Bok’s), or Kenneth Goldsmith’s should be considered Da Da. Da Da was composed of quick improvs and manifestos (in large part). Not so, the work of aforementioned poets. )
.
I disagree with this: what counts is the finished poem, not how it was done.
.
When was Self Portrait in the Convex Mirror published? The title poem was shockingly non non-referential.
.
The Age of Huts by Ron Silliman should be considered simply for its ambition, the size of the thing.
.
Size may not be even the most important indicator of ambition.
.
I don’t consider myself well enough versed in other stream poets to mention an actual title as of yet.
.
Are we embarrassing yet?
.
–Bob
.

 (The last bit is a reference to someone’s calling a thread Stephen and I were on an embarrassment.)
.
 Slightly later, I made a second response: “Another bit of my boilerplate is that I’d want to make a list of what poems of the ones I’m familiar with I consider the most important, many of which may not be on my list of “best poems.” One or two might not even be poems.”
.

Entry 727 — Analysis of One’s Own Poems

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

From Stephen Russell, at New-Poetry: “Occupy mainstream poetry.  I bet Grumman would be on board.”

Me: “Not quite.  Too many differences, one being that I consider that otherstream poets are the one-percent—the less-than-one-percent, actually–and that they are superior to mainstream poets whereas I consider the political occupiers inferior to the “one-percent” they are concerned with.  Another is that I believe in attacking groups I have differences with, with arguments, not crowds: it’s who has the better thinking that counts for me, not who has the most votes, or the equivalent.”

Russell: “But seriously . . . it is clear that many ‘poets’ do not study poetry.”

Me: “I’ve been thinking along those lines the past few days, too—because of a current project of mine, writing analyses of each of my poems.  A lawyer friend giving me extremely helpful layman feed-back seems to like my analyses but wondered if a poet analyzing his own poems might not be a tad narcissistic.  I do think I’m more self-involved than many, but in this case involved with my vocation, not really my self.  One defense I used was that no one else was analyzing my poems.  They seem to need it, too, because of their unusualness.  Also, I analyze lots of poems by others , too.  Later, I realized that all poets must analyze their own poems to some degree, even if they don’t necessarily do so formally, or even write out their analyses.  All writers—even lawyers writing position papers—must analyze their own writings

“Immediately I questioned that: I have trouble imagining a writer simply composing something without looking it over to see what he’s done and if there’s any way he can make it better, but I suppose there must be some who do.  A more interesting question is to what degree various poets analyze their own poems.  I doubt that many analyze them anywhere near as much as I analyze mine.  Is that good or bad?  Or neither: a matter of to each his own?  My own compulsion to analyze makes it hard for me not to believe those significantly less analytical than I deficient as students of poetry, and that their poems suffer a lack of depth due to it.  Not that the over-analyticals’ poems don’t likely suffer from an excess of Important Meaning.”

.

Elderly Codger Health Report « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Elderly Codger Health Report’ Category

Entry 1685 — Two Plumbing Updates

Wednesday, January 7th, 2015

Yesterday, thinking about today’s appointment with my cardiologist when I would find out how the carotid artery exam I had last week came out, I thought how much finding out my carotid arteries were okay would boost me out of my current zone, which is a better zone than my null zone, but only barely.  Well, I got what I was told was good news: 25% blockage  in the left artery, 30% in the right.  This doesn’t sound very good to me but is good for someone my age.  You’re not in bad shape until the blockage reaches 70%.  Note: I’m not sure the percentage refers to blockage, only that it’s something that would be zero for a artery in perfect condition.

I was relieved, but it didn’t have much effect on me.  Why?  Well, last night, around nine, my bedtime, I noticed some water seeping into my bathroom.  This has happened before at least twice due to my A/C ‘s having a clogged drainage tube, so I checked that.  The tube seemed okay.  I thought about calling the company I bought the A/C from but decided to wait until morning to avoid an extra charge,  The seepage seemed very slow.  But it keep on, so I eventually called in a guy I thought would be able to do something about the leak regardless of whether or not it was an A/C problem or a damaged pipe.  He turned out to be only an A/C  specialist.  Sometime after one A.M., he basically gave up.  My A/C’s drainage system had nothing wrong with it, he said, but he put a cap on a tube inside the house that was supposed to be on whatever the tube was.  Its being off may have caused the problem.  It made no sense to me, and he thought it unlikely.  So I was as bad off as I’d been when I’d called him in, except that I was out his $129 fee for an emergency visit.  (A daytime visit would have cost $100 less.)

I took a sleeping pill to make sure I got some sleep, thinking it might be difficult for me to.  But I went back to a thriller I was reading for a while, then checked the leak to make sure it wasn’t worsening.  It had stopped.  I watched where the water had been seeping in, which I’d dried.  No seepage.  Yes, my bad luck turned out to be less bad than I had feared.  The area has now been dry for almost 24 hours.  I still worry that it’ll return, but it hasn’t yet.  It was enough to mess up my day today, though.  I did get four hours of sleep, but the day after I use a sleeping pill, I usually feel a crappiness different from the way I general feel–not replacing it, but adding to it.  In short, I had a crummy day.  Hence, this old man whine for today’s entry here.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1643 — A Drooby Day

Wednesday, November 26th, 2014

A cold day for Florida today: around sixty but very windy, seemingly from every direction.  I went out in it on my bike to the clinic I’ve been having physical therapy at for my final session.  It consisted mostly of a massage.  I have improved a good deal because of the therapy.  I may be back to about where I was a month or so ago except that I lack the running stamina I had then, although that was not all that much, and I can’t take off in anything like a true sprint the way I was almost able too at my best this past summer (and seeming then to be becoming better at).  I’m finally seriously exercising and have a reasonable hope of becoming a seventy-year-old in good shape again in another month or so, if I can keep doing my exercises.

My latest strange symptom of who knows what–a kind of pressure near my . . . sternum?  I just looked it up: yes, the sternum, but the bottom of it.  It seems to have subsided.  I still think I have a touch of stomach cancer, naturally, being the way I am, but am not yet ready to go to my doctor about it.

When I started this entry, I wasn’t planning to bore you with my latest elderly codger health report, but had nothing else to say, so it just droobed out.  And I ain’t got no more to say.
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 623 — My Decline « POETICKS

Entry 623 — My Decline

Well, according to astrology, I’ve begun to decline vocationally after reaching my peak a week or two ago.  It wasn’t much of a peak.  I got my art on display, but doubt that more than a handful of people have looked at it, and probably no more than one or two has really looked at it.  I haven’t been very productive, either.  I’m going to return to my Shakespeare book today (after a little head-start last night).  My intention is to either finish it, or–if I have significant trouble with it–switch to another project of mine, a non-fiction book that may be of general-interest but I’ll say no more about–to keep its theme, which is original, I think, and will be its main selling point, a secret.  I will say that it’s about life in general, not about Shakespeare, psychology or poetics. 

To make this entry more than a diary entry, here’s a poem of mine from a year or so ago.   I posted it then, but just now made a slight change to it, making a whole new poem.  I changed “full” to “certain.”  I decided the implication that I’d come to understand everything was dumb.  Now what kind of understanding I’d achieved is unclear, but should come across as Important.  I don’t know whether this poem became visual later; I don’t think it did.  I think it may work best as is, but who knows.

.

Leave a Reply

Entry 385 — My Most-Used Coinage « POETICKS

Entry 385 — My Most-Used Coinage

On 2/21/2011 3:21 AM, Jake Berry wrote:

Bob,  Hope this finds you well. I'm working on an essay and I'd like to use your term 'otherstream', but I want to quote your definition of the word directly. I haven't been able to find it on the internet and I have no idea where it might be among all my books and papers. So how would you define it?  Best, Jake 

Terrific hearing from you, Jake–although it makes me feel guilty by reminding me of what a horrible correspondent I’ve been for going on ten years or more.  So many people I haven’t kept in touch with but should have!  Although I do keep up with you on the Internet.

Ah, the old days when I was one of the Kings of the  . . . Otherstream because I owned my own Xerox!  I’ve had some ungood years since then.  2010 was possibly the worst year I’ve had in thirty years.  But this year, so far, is going pretty well, although right now I’m in my null zone again.

Maybe not–your e.mail has me at least partway out of it.  Great to know someone still likes my coinage, and it was fun doing my own search for it on the Internet.  I found an article about Dale Jensen and his wife, Judy Wells, in which the term was used, followed by a comment by Jack Foley (good ol’ Jack) declaring that Andrew Joron had not coined “otherstream,” Bob Grumman had!

Somewhere else some guy took credit for coining it in 1996. My guess is that I first used it around 1985, so it has just has its 25th anniversary.  If I, indeed, was the first to use it.  Who knows if I did or not.  I don’t care.  I mean, it’d be nice to know for sure some word that more than a few people use was my word, but I’m really not that big about getting credit.  I want money, not credit!

Oh, I also found out there are various businesses calling themselves “otherstream” this or that, including, I think, a broadcast network.

So, a definition.  I’ve defined it in different although similar ways.  I think I would say that “otherstream” is my adjective for kinds works of art the great majority of arts academics, well-known critics, commercial publishers and commercial magazine editors know little more than the names of, if that.  A brief definition: art that’s now taught in college classes.  For me, it means approximately but only approximately the opposite of “mainstream.”  What it’s the exact opposite of is “knownstream.”  That’s because some art is knownstream, like certain kinds of very formal verse–the sestina, say, is well-known to most literature professors but is not what you’d call a kind of mainstream poetry.  I don’t think cowboy poems are considered mainstream, either, or though fairly popular.  I used it mainly for visual poetry, sound poetry and language poetry when I began using it, but some language poetry has become mainstream.

Hope this helps.  Thanks for wanting to use the word, which I think is a useful one.  And for inspiring me to write what I have here, which I can now use for today’s entry in my blog!  Make sure to link me to your essay when it’s online, or send it to me if it’s printed–with the hundred dollar royalty fee I charge for the use of any of my coinages.  (You can use “knownstream,” also mine, for half-price.)

all best, Bob

Leave a Reply