Samuel Beckett « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Samuel Beckett’ Category

Entry 425 — Lunberry Installation, Part 3

Sunday, April 17th, 2011

Finally I’m returning to Clark Lunberry’s installation.  Ironically, I already had the words I’m posting written–they’re all from the diary entry I made when I got home from Jacksonville, although somewhat revised:

So, we spent time at a Farmers’ Market–part of it very very pleasantly, under a freeway underpass on a bank of the river through Jacksonville, the name of which I now forget.   We had lunch there, while listening to a girl singer accompanied by guitar–in the folk vein, I guess, and nice.  Then quite a distance to the college Clark teaches at to see his installation (as well as an excellent exhibition of some of Marton’s pieces) .  I wasn’t prepared for the outdoor part of the installation, “SENSATION” making an X with “THINKING” floating in the center of a small pond with geese swimming in it in front of where we parked.  An evolving installation: later Clark rowed out to the X in a kayak and changed “THINKING” to “INKING.”  It seemed okay to me.  The words are from a quotation from Cezanne he’s done many variations on at other installations of this particular (4-year) installation.

The installation continued in the library building next to the pond.  First, the long glassed-in  exhibition space in the library’s lobby I had a picture of a few entries ago.  In it were a huge number of books on water, trees and sky, plus an intriguing mush of torn pages of text in the jar that summed up the adventure into a secret cave that all the books contained.  Then three visual poems, each taking up one portion of the stairway window, or glass wall, that faced the pond.  The first featured repetitions of the word, “WATER,” the second “TREES, the third “SKY.”  These are in many of the other versions of the  installation’s . . .  “frames.”  Several other texts in much smaller letters, some of them sentences, crossed the windows.  I was enthralled with the way one could see through these texts into the pond, and the trees beyond, and–finally–into the sky (wonderfully cloud-clumped when we were there) .   (Sound effects were included although only the ones for “WATER” were working at this time.)

I immediately thought of Bob Lax (a favorite p0et of Clark’s too, I learned).  Clark is a big fan of Samuel Beckett’s (whom he’s been teaching many for five or more years), who is also an obvious influence.  But he’s also absorbed and created out of many other influences, many of them non-literary.

Robert Lax « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Robert Lax’ Category

Entry 425 — Lunberry Installation, Part 3

Sunday, April 17th, 2011

Finally I’m returning to Clark Lunberry’s installation.  Ironically, I already had the words I’m posting written–they’re all from the diary entry I made when I got home from Jacksonville, although somewhat revised:

So, we spent time at a Farmers’ Market–part of it very very pleasantly, under a freeway underpass on a bank of the river through Jacksonville, the name of which I now forget.   We had lunch there, while listening to a girl singer accompanied by guitar–in the folk vein, I guess, and nice.  Then quite a distance to the college Clark teaches at to see his installation (as well as an excellent exhibition of some of Marton’s pieces) .  I wasn’t prepared for the outdoor part of the installation, “SENSATION” making an X with “THINKING” floating in the center of a small pond with geese swimming in it in front of where we parked.  An evolving installation: later Clark rowed out to the X in a kayak and changed “THINKING” to “INKING.”  It seemed okay to me.  The words are from a quotation from Cezanne he’s done many variations on at other installations of this particular (4-year) installation.

The installation continued in the library building next to the pond.  First, the long glassed-in  exhibition space in the library’s lobby I had a picture of a few entries ago.  In it were a huge number of books on water, trees and sky, plus an intriguing mush of torn pages of text in the jar that summed up the adventure into a secret cave that all the books contained.  Then three visual poems, each taking up one portion of the stairway window, or glass wall, that faced the pond.  The first featured repetitions of the word, “WATER,” the second “TREES, the third “SKY.”  These are in many of the other versions of the  installation’s . . .  “frames.”  Several other texts in much smaller letters, some of them sentences, crossed the windows.  I was enthralled with the way one could see through these texts into the pond, and the trees beyond, and–finally–into the sky (wonderfully cloud-clumped when we were there) .   (Sound effects were included although only the ones for “WATER” were working at this time.)

I immediately thought of Bob Lax (a favorite p0et of Clark’s too, I learned).  Clark is a big fan of Samuel Beckett’s (whom he’s been teaching many for five or more years), who is also an obvious influence.  But he’s also absorbed and created out of many other influences, many of them non-literary.

Entry 47 — Solution of a Cryptographiku

Friday, December 18th, 2009

The Four Seasons

.

3 31 43 73 5 67    3 61 43 67 67 19 41 13    1    11 19 7 31 5    3 12 15 21 4 19    3 18 15 19 19 9 14 7    1    6 9 5 12 4    8 21 25 33 9 30    8 28 25 30 30 16 24 14    4    12 16 10 21 9    64 441 625 1089 81 900    64 784 625 900 900 256 576 196    16    144 256 100 441 81

.

Today, the solution, with an explanation, to the above.

1. Each line says, “clouds crossing a field.”

2. A reader should know from its looks and the fact that it is a cryptographiku that it is a coded text.  He should try simple codes at first on all the lines, the way one would in order to solve a cryptogram.  If he’s familiar with my other cryptographiku, he will know I’ve more than once used the simplest of numeric codes.  Such is the case here, in line 2.  The code is 1 = a, 2 = b, etc.

3. The codes used for the other lines are harder to figure out, but the lines themselves give an important clue as to what they say: they each consist of four words, the first six letters in length, the second eight, the fourth one (which would almost certainly be “a”) and the fourth five.  That ought to make one guess that each repeats the decoded one.  As each indeed does.

4. It should be evident that the code for the fourth line uses the squares of the numbers in the code for the third.  The basis of the arrangement of numbers in the third line will probably not be easy to guess.

5. If you consider what kind of numbers are being used in a given line, and are at all mathematical, you will realize that the numbers used in line one are all primes, with the first prime, 1, representing a, the seond prime, 2, representing be, and so on.

6. The next step is trickier but also requires one to think about kind of numbers.  It turns out that the numbers used for the code in line three are the non-primes in order, with first of them, 4, representing a, the second, 6, representing b.

7. The surface meaning of the lines and the kinds of coding they’ve been put in is now known.  All that remains is to find if a larger meaning in intended (yes) and, if so, what it is, and what the logic behind the coding is (and the kind of coding used in a cryptographiku is, by definition, meaningful.  Wallace Stevens, whom one familiar with my poetry and criticism will know is important to me, helps with the last of these questions.  Stevens wrote many poems (“Man on the Dump,” for instance) meditating on the idea that winter is pure reality, summer poeticized reality.  Or, winter is primary, so can be metaphorically thought of a consisting of prime numbers only.  Spring, by this reasoning, can logically consist of all the (lowest) numbers, summer of only factorable numbers, numbers that can be reduced to simpler numbers–expanded, poeticized numbers.  Autumn, the peak of the year because it yields the fruit of the year, consists of summer’s numbers squared, or geometrically increased.

8. The final meaning of the poem is derived from its repetition of the simple nature scene about the clouds.  A reader aware of Robert Lax’s work (and he will, if he’s familiar with mine), will know that he has a number of poems that repeat words or phrases–to suggest, among much else, ongoingness, permanence, undisturbable serenity.  My hope is that this poem will make a reader feel the change of seasons within the grand permanence that Nature ultimately is.  A constant message, in different coding as the seasons change.

9. All this should lead to “Whee!”

5. The decoded text uses a technique Robert Lax pioneered in to convey a meaning I consider archetypally deep, like the meanings Lax’s similar poems have for me.

6. The final meaning of the poem is (a) Nature is eternally changing; and (b) Nature is eternally unchanging. When I saw I could make iti say that, I got a thrill! I consider this poem one of my best inventions–even though I’m not sure it works as a poem.

Have fun, kids!

Entry 46 — Clues

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

The Four Seasons

.

3 31 43 73 5 67    3 61 43 67 67 19 41 13    1    11 19 7 31 5    3 12 15 21 4 19    3 18 15 19 19 9 14 7    1    6 9 5 12 4    8 21 25 33 9 30    8 28 25 30 30 16 24 14    4    12 16 10 21 9    64 441 625 1089 81 900    64 784 625 900 900 256 576 196    16    144 256 100 441 81

.

Today, just some helpful clues toward the solution of the cyrptographiku above:

1. A cryptographiku is a poem in a code.  The code chosen and the way it works has metaphorical significance.  The text encoded is generally straight-forward.

2. There are three codes used here, one of them very simple, the other two simple if you are mathematical.

3. The codes were chosen to illustrate a theme of Wallace Stevens’s, to wit: winter is reality at its most fundamental, summer is winter transformed by metaphorical layering.

4. Note that each of thr three lines is the same length, and divided into three “words,” each the same length of the homologous “word” in the other two lines.

5. The decoded text uses a technique Robert Lax pioneered in to convey a meaning I consider archetypally deep, like the meanings Lax’s similar poems have for me.

6. The final meaning of the poem is (a) Nature is eternally changing; and (b) Nature is eternally unchanging.  When I saw I could make ti say that, I got a thrill!  I consider this poem one of my best inventions–even though I’m not sure it works as a poem.

Have fun, kids!

Entry 47 — Solution of a Cryptographiku « POETICKS

Entry 47 — Solution of a Cryptographiku

The Four Seasons

.

3 31 43 73 5 67    3 61 43 67 67 19 41 13    1    11 19 7 31 5  3 12 15 21 4 19    3 18 15 19 19 9 14 7    1    6 9 5 12 4  8 21 25 33 9 30    8 28 25 30 30 16 24 14    4    12 16 10 21 9  64 441 625 1089 81 900    64 784 625 900 900 256 576 196    16    144 256 100 441 81

.

Today, the solution, with an explanation, to the above.

1. Each line says, “clouds crossing a field.”

2. A reader should know from its looks and the fact that it is a cryptographiku that it is a coded text.  He should try simple codes at first on all the lines, the way one would in order to solve a cryptogram.  If he’s familiar with my other cryptographiku, he will know I’ve more than once used the simplest of numeric codes.  Such is the case here, in line 2.  The code is 1 = a, 2 = b, etc.

3. The codes used for the other lines are harder to figure out, but the lines themselves give an important clue as to what they say: they each consist of four words, the first six letters in length, the second eight, the fourth one (which would almost certainly be “a”) and the fourth five.  That ought to make one guess that each repeats the decoded one.  As each indeed does.

4. It should be evident that the code for the fourth line uses the squares of the numbers in the code for the third.  The basis of the arrangement of numbers in the third line will probably not be easy to guess.

5. If you consider what kind of numbers are being used in a given line, and are at all mathematical, you will realize that the numbers used in line one are all primes, with the first prime, 1, representing a, the seond prime, 2, representing be, and so on.

6. The next step is trickier but also requires one to think about kind of numbers.  It turns out that the numbers used for the code in line three are the non-primes in order, with first of them, 4, representing a, the second, 6, representing b.

7. The surface meaning of the lines and the kinds of coding they’ve been put in is now known.  All that remains is to findif a larger meaning in intended (yes) and, if so, what it is, and what the logic behind the coding is (and the kind of coding used in a cryptographiku is, by definition, meaningful.  Wallace Stevens, whom one familiar with my poetry and criticism will know is important to me, helps with the last of these questions.  Stevens wrote many poems (“Man on the Dump,” for instance) meditating on the idea that winter is pure reality, summer poeticized reality.  Or, winter is primary, so can be metaphorically thought of a consisting of prime numbers only.  Spring, by this reasoning, can logically consist of all the (lowest) numbers, summer of oonly factorable numbers, numbers that can be reduced to simpler numbers–expanded, poeticized numbers.  Autumn, the peak of the year because it yields the fruit of the year, consists of summer’s numbers squared, or geometrically increased.

8. The final meaning of the poem is derived from its repetition of the simple nature scene about the clouds.  A reader aware of Robert Lax’s work (and he will, if he’s familiar with mine), will know that he has a number of poems that repeat words or phrases–to suggest, among much else, ongoingness, permanence, undisturbably serenity.  My hope is that this poem will make a reader feel the change of seasons within the grand permanence that Narture ultimately is.  A constant message, in different coding as the seasons change.

9. All this should lead to “Whee!”

5. The decoded text uses a technique Robert Lax pioneered in to convey a meaning I consider archetypally deep, like the meanings Lax’s similar poems have for me.

6. The final meaning of the poem is (a) Nature is eternally changing; and (b) Nature is eternally unchanging. When I saw I could make ti say that, I got a thrill! I consider this poem one of my best inventions–even though I’m not sure it works as a poem.

Have fun, kids!

Leave a Reply

Entry 46 — Clues « POETICKS

Entry 46 — Clues

The Four Seasons

.

3 31 43 73 5 67    3 61 43 67 67 19 41 13    1    11 19 7 31 5  3 12 15 21 4 19    3 18 15 19 19 9 14 7    1    6 9 5 12 4  8 21 25 33 9 30    8 28 25 30 30 16 24 14    4    12 16 10 21 9  64 441 625 1089 81 900    64 784 625 900 900 256 576 196    16    144 256 100 441 81

.

Today, just some helpful clues toward the solution of the cyrptographiku above:

1. A cryptographiku is a poem in a code.  The code chosen and the way it works has metaphorical significance.  The text encoded is generally straight-forward.

2. There are three codes used here, one of them very simple, the other two simple if you are mathematical.

3. The codes were chosen to illustrate a theme of Wallace Stevens’s, to wit: winter is reality at its most fundamental, summer is winter transformed by metaphorical layering.

4. Note that each of thr three lines is the same length, and divided into three “words,” each the same length of the homologous “word” in the other two lines.

5. The decoded text uses a technique Robert Lax pioneered in to convey a meaning I consider archetypally deep, like the meanings Lax’s similar poems have for me.

6. The final meaning of the poem is (a) Nature is eternally changing; and (b) Nature is eternally unchanging.  When I saw I could make ti say that, I got a thrill!  I consider this poem one of my best inventions–even though I’m not sure it works as a poem.

Have fun, kids!

Leave a Reply