There’s a Penguin anthology of twentieth-century out. It’s edited by Rita Dove. Here’s a list of the poets represented in it, with thanks to John Jeffrey for having alphabetized it:
Ai
Elizabeth Alexander
Sherman Alexie
Paula Gunn Allen
A.R. Ammons
John Ashbery
W. H. Auden
Amiri Baraka (LeRoi Jones)
Ted Berrigan
John Berryman
Frank Bidart
Elizabeth Bishop
Robert Bly
Louise Bogan
Gwendolyn Brooks
Olga Broumas
Hayden Carruth
Lorna Dee Cervantes
Marilyn Chin
Sandra Cisneros
Lucille Clifton
Judith Ortiz Cofer
Billy Collins
Gregory Corso
Hart Crane
Robert Creeley
Victor Hernandez Cruz
Countee Cullen
E. E. Cummings
Carl Dennis
Toi Derricotte
James Dickey
Stephen Dobyns
Hilda Doolittle (H.D.)
Mark Doty
Rita Dove
Norman Dubie
Alan Dugan
Paul Lawrence Dunbar
Alice Moore Dunbar-Nelson
Robert Duncan
Stephen Dunn
Cornelius Eady
Russell Edson
T. S. Eliot
Louis Erdrich
B.H. Fairchild
Lawrence Ferlinghetti
Annie Finch
Nick Flynn
Carolyn Forche
Robert Francis
Robert Frost
Alice Fulton
Tess Gallagher
Albert Goldbarth
Jorie Graham
Angelina Weld Grimke
Donald Hall
Barbara Hamby
Joy Harjo
Michael S. Harper
Robert Hass
Robert Hayden
Terrance Hayes
Anthony Hecht
Lyn Hejinian
Garrett Hongo
Marie Howe
Andrew Hudgins
Langston Hughes
Richard Hugo
Mark Jarman
Randall Jarrell
Robinson Jeffers
James Weldon Johnson
June Jordan
Weldon Kees
Brigit Pegeen Kelly
Galway Kinnell
Carolyn Kizer
Joanna Klink
Etheridge Knight
Kenneth Koch
Yusef Komunyakaa
Maxine Kumin
Stanley Kunitz
Li-Young Lee
Denise Levertove
Philip Levine
Larry Levis
Audre Lorde
Adrian C. Louis
Amy Lowell
Robert Lowell
Thomas Lux
Nathaniel Mackey
Archibald MacLeish
Haki R. Madhubuti (Don L. Lee)
David Mason
Edgar Lee Masters
William Matthews
Heather McHugh
Claude McKay
William Meredith
James Merrill
W. S. Merwin
Jane Miller
Marianne Moore
Paul Muldoon
Harryette Mullen
Carol Muske-Dukes
Marilyn Nelson
Howard Nemerov
Naomi Shihab Nye
Frank O’Hara
Sharon Olds
Mary Oliver
Charles Olson
Gregory Orr
Michael Palmer
Carl Phillips
Robert Pinsky
Ezra Pound
Dudley Randell
Adrienne Rich
Alberto Rios
Edwin Arlington Robinson
Theodore Roethke
Muriel Rukeyser
Kay Ryan
Sonia Sanchez
Carl Sandburg
Delmore Schwartz
Frederick Seidel
Anne Sexton
Brenda Shaughnessy
Laurie Sheck
Leslie Marmon Silko
Charles Simic
Louis Simpson
Gary Snyder
Cathy Song
Gary Soto
David St. John
William Stafford
A.E. Stallings
Gertrude Stein
Gerald Stern
Wallace Stevens
Susan Stewart
Ron Stilliman
Ruth Stone
Mark Strand
James Tate
Henry Taylor
Sara Teasdale
Melvin B. Tolson
Jean Toomer
Natasha Trethewey
Reetika Vazirani
Diane Wakoski
Derek Walcott
Margaret Walker
James Welch
Roberta HIll Whiteman
Richard Wilbur
C. K. Williams
Miller Williams
William Carlos Williams
C. D. Wright
Charles Wright
Franz Wright
James Wright
Kevin Young
After seeing this list, I said what I knew I’d be saying before seeing it in a comment at a blog where it had been given an “A”: “Close to worthless. The good poets in it are already amply anthologized. Whole schools of the best American poets of the last forty years of American Poetry are entirely ignored. The one with Robert Lax in it (minimalism) for just one example. The editors of POETRY will find little in it, or not in it, to complain about-–which is proof of how bad it is.”
Another ignored school, needless to say, is visual poetry, as represented by much of the work of John M. Bennett, such as this duo, “Cardboard,” that he posted just today (and he’s done scores as good):
I doubt anyone has more completely captured the essence of carboardedness–or the shuddery feel of decaying tenement rooms–than John has with these. But with strangely joyful coloring in sharp contradiction of shuddering and tenements, but somehow absolutely right. As with the poem by Gregory I seem to have abandoned, I find I need time before I’ll be able fully to appreciate these.
The Penguin anthology annoyed me, but after reflecting only briefly, it cheered me up: a comparison of its poets coming into their prime after 1950 to the poets in my crowd such as John M. Bennett could not more perfectly exemplify academic art (including, I was amused to see, the least innovative portion of what’s being called “language poetry”) versus living art. I may be deceived about the value of my work, but I know I’m not about that of my fellow visual poets. We’re the Monets, Renoirs, van Goghs, Cezannes, they the French academics.
.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011 at 12:00 AM and is filed under Visual Poetry Specimen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Rita Dove’s response to Helen Vendler’s review, here:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/dec/22/defending-anthology/
Also, I recommend reading her interview about the anthology in the current (Dec. 2011) AWP “Writer’s Chronicle”.
Thanks, Fred. Thanks to the New-Poetry discussion group, I’ve already gotten to the New York Review of Books respnse by Dove. Not much to it but denial of the validity of what Vendler said–without saying what was wrong with it, as far as I could see. As I said at New-Poetry, it’s a shame that the New York Review of Books publishes poor articles about American poetry like Vendler’s and Dove’s when there are many who could write much better articles on the subject for it. Yes, folks, like me.
all best, Bob