Entry 1663 — Birds of Paradise « POETICKS

Entry 1663 — Birds of Paradise

A friend sent me this link and I thought it interesting enough to interrupt my latest outburst of super-genius with today: Birds of Paradise.

At first I thought, “Wow, this may be the first species capable of sensitivity to aesthetic variation besides ours, despite the amazing smallness of their nervous systems!” At first that seemed neat to me. Then I realized that it contradicted my theory of human sensitivity to boredom, which makes them desire aesthetic variation.  I couldn’t see how the complicated mechanisms I’d hypothesized for that could fit in a birdbrain.  Ergo, I now propose that Mother Nature is simply experimenting–what’s going on in natural-selection-in-progress.  But because it’s taking place in a rain forest cut off (I gather) from most of the world, the birds are protected from normal competition, so can take a long time letting the females of the species, and the forest, weather–and, now, human beings (who will probably let continuing variety be selected as they have done with orchids) select the fittest featheration to go with.

The birds aren’t necessarily reacting to variation (although some birds can, I now recall, apparently react to auditory variation . . .), but to different shapes and colors–and, perhaps, size.  In due course, if this is the case, they would (without interference from human beings) have chosen some fairly standard kind of tail, with the males with the most colorful, and/or biggest, passing on their genes.

To amplify: in more usual circumstances, a male coming up with an antenna with a bell on the top of it, or whatever, might be more easy to sight by predators, or have a little more trouble escaping because the thing would hit things as he took flight; but here, there apparently are few or no avian predators, so any drawbacks any given variation results in will have to be excessive to have a negative Darwinian effect on a bird.

Note: I had trouble with my speakers while watching the film, so missed most of the commentary.  I therefore may have repeated what was said–or missed something said that would refute something, or everything I said.  The main thing, though, is to enjoy the film–although, I of course hope my comments, right or wrong, will have some entertainment value.)
.

AmazingCounters.com

Leave a Reply

Evolution « POETICKS

Archive for the ‘Evolution’ Category

Entry 1663 — Birds of Paradise

Tuesday, December 16th, 2014

A friend sent me this link and I thought it interesting enough to interrupt my latest outburst of super-genius with today: Birds of Paradise.

At first I thought, “Wow, this may be the first species capable of sensitivity to aesthetic variation besides ours, despite the amazing smallness of their nervous systems!” At first that seemed neat to me. Then I realized that it contradicted my theory of human sensitivity to boredom, which makes them desire aesthetic variation.  I couldn’t see how the complicated mechanisms I’d hypothesized for that could fit in a birdbrain.  Ergo, I now propose that Mother Nature is simply experimenting–what’s going on in natural-selection-in-progress.  But because it’s taking place in a rain forest cut off (I gather) from most of the world, the birds are protected from normal competition, so can take a long time letting the females of the species, and the forest, weather–and, now, human beings (who will probably let continuing variety be selected as they have done with orchids) select the fittest featheration to go with.

The birds aren’t necessarily reacting to variation (although some birds can, I now recall, apparently react to auditory variation . . .), but to different shapes and colors–and, perhaps, size.  In due course, if this is the case, they would (without interference from human beings) have chosen some fairly standard kind of tail, with the males with the most colorful, and/or biggest, passing on their genes.

To amplify: in more usual circumstances, a male coming up with an antenna with a bell on the top of it, or whatever, might be more easy to sight by predators, or have a little more trouble escaping because the thing would hit things as he took flight; but here, there apparently are few or no avian predators, so any drawbacks any given variation results in will have to be excessive to have a negative Darwinian effect on a bird.

Note: I had trouble with my speakers while watching the film, so missed most of the commentary.  I therefore may have repeated what was said–or missed something said that would refute something, or everything I said.  The main thing, though, is to enjoy the film–although, I of course hope my comments, right or wrong, will have some entertainment value.)
.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1619 — Evolutionary Theory at its Crudest

Sunday, November 2nd, 2014

First, a short announcement: Anny Ballardini has a lot of good stuff in Truck, which she is driving this month.  She just posted something of mine at http://halvard-johnson.blogspot.it/2014/11/bob-grumman.html.

Now for a continuation of my entry of two days ago, with a repetition of the end of the latter.  I’m floundering but hope no one notices.

First there were simple crystallizations, or so I believe “informed” speculation has it; certainly, it makes sense to me.  Eventually, molecules containing carbon complicate things.  Amino acids, stuff like that.  Proteins, eventually.  I had a not-totally unsound knowledge of dna/ rna/etc at one time; only have what I need to theorize now: in other words, nothing I can gussy up my musings with.)

The crystallizations formed membranes, or some equivalent thereof, and became able to take in substances that would make them grow, and excrete substances that might otherwise destroy them.  (None of this is original, by the way, except inasmuch as I get my remembrance of things I’ve read wrong.)  When they get large enough, they divide.

CONTINUATION

Eventually, carbon compounds get into the picture.  Let’s call what we now have “the alphazoan” (elitism alert, elistism alert!!!) for yesterday’s superior lifeform that will eventually evolve into today’s us.  It will begin just bumping into things, some of which it digests, some of which digest its siblings, but—by chance—not it.  By chance, it eventually develops a membrane that tends to let in good stuff and block bad stuff.

It multiplies.  So do other kinds of zoa with equal adaptations.  Some become prey, others become predators it must avoid.  Our boy will by luck do the latter.

It will also develop a means of propulsion.  Something that makes it go constantly forward (by definition) may be advantageous because it causes it to bump into edibles more frequently, especially stationary ones.  At the same time, it will cause it to bump into something that eats things like it more frequently.  Conclusion: neither an advantage nor disadvantage . . . at first.

One way things could plausibly go is that its membrane evolves a part, a sensory unit, that is sensitive to touching some other zoan and reacting in some manner.  It seems to me this might become a permanent trait although irrelevant for a long time.

Previously, perhaps (bear with me, I’ll be jumping around), the alphazoan will have formed the first biological sensory-unit, my guess is one that is sensitive to light.  More exactly, a unit that will react chemically to a photon.  Meaningless, until the reaction in some way causes motion.  That motion will most likely be either toward or away from light.  The alphazoan, necessarily for the purposes of my story Very Lucky, will automatically go toward light, and lit areas will turn out to be good areas for him—lots of prey, say, and few predators.

Meanwhile, others developing similar sensors will go extinct because of being directed toward the dark or not liking the food in lit areas.

Once the alphazoan has evolved a single trait that can use a stimulus in the environment to guide the alphazoan to or from something, the zoan has a kind of will.  It can now react with motion to some stimulus.  This means it can evolve many other like sensory-unit-motion-effectors such as a unit in its membrane sensitive to the tactile sensation caused by a predator that has touched it, and reacting with motion the other way; or reacting to the touch of a prey the other way.  Proto-reflexes.

Eventually, sensory-units will develop that can distinguish shades of light and make more sophisticate behavior possible: e.g. motion toward something of a certain gray which is edible and away from something else a slightly different shade of gray which isn’t, or is a predator.

We are now approaching proto-intelligence, or the first brain.  This will occur when a sensory-unit activates a relay-unit rather than a motion-unit, and the relay-unit activates the motion-unit.  It will be hit&miss until one of these mechanisms does something biological advantageous, probably nothing new, like moving away from a stimulus of a certain shade of gray, but for the first time giving the alphazoan wider possibilities—i.e., the ability to hook up with any effector in the zoan, rather than one close by.  Small advantage, but one which keeps the protobrain in each zoan the alphazoan divides into until greater advantages are possible.

It won’t happen all at once, but incrementally it will come to pass that two relay-cells will share a brain (the zoan will eventually have several “brains”) neither ad- nor disad-vantageously.  The next step will be crucial: One relay-cell will develop the ability to inhibit the other.  This will pay off when its sensor detects predator ahead and the other relay-unit’s sensory detects prey ahead.

Instead of trying to advance and retreat simultaneously, the zoan will retreat.  (Ever luck, remember: many other zoa will develop brains that make them advance instead of holding their ground.)

.

AmazingCounters.com

Entry 1403 –Squirrel Poem & Comment

Tuesday, March 25th, 2014

With the following I got my string of poemtexts-a-day up to five yesterday afternoon.  It seems to me interestingly horrible.  Is my limit four at least semi-interesting texts in a row?  Or was I just off when I typed “A Squirrel.”  I spelled “Plantagents” right the first time.

A Squirrel

A squirrel squirped across the front of
Poem’s bicycle before he cut his speed so as
to miss it, which he did, anyway.
So, he thought, did the goo-balls of Hell
keep their plates clean enough for the Plantagenets
to play billiards on.

The whale in his path was
slower, but
still got by soon enough to avoid
a collision. No

thin
g

aroided into him
unflitfully enough to
make his time in the text he
was in worth his being
in.
But he
couldn’t leave it
nor prot
est.

My comment will be to an article about the evolutionary value of beauty in art.  It was in Aeon, a moderately interesting Internet magazine I’m now getting daily.  According to the article, art, in creating beauty, gives us  valuable practice in acute perceptual discrimination, etc.  I’m sure it does that but I believe its main evolutionary advantage (and it has more than a few) is its ability simply . . .  to give us pleasure.  Without that life would in many cases be too uninteresting or even painfully boring to be worth living.  No doubt most of us would continue to go through the motions if we had no art, but without zest, with much less to look forward to than we have now.

I said that just now–in what is the first comment to the article, which was posted yesterday.  I wonder if anyone will respond to it.  I plan to wrote a much more detailed essay on the evolutionary advantage of art–with a secret hope that I can get Aeon to publish it.

.

AmazingCounters.com