Comments on: Entry 89 — IQ, EQ and CQ http://poeticks.com/2010/01/29/entry-89-chapter-1-11/ Mon, 21 May 2012 05:20:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bob Grumman http://poeticks.com/2010/01/29/entry-89-chapter-1-11/comment-page-1/#comment-363 Bob Grumman Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:37:56 +0000 http://poeticks.com/2010/01/28/entry-89-chapter-1-11/#comment-363 As I said, roundedness is something I need to think about more. I, of course, am not implying that genius requires it but suggesting that the higher one's roundedness quotient is, the more effective one will likely be at creating or postulating--although one's creativity quotient would outweigh it, as would a true intelligence quotient, which would measure much more than short-term numeracy and literacy and the mental manipulation of geometric shapes and whatever else most IQ tests measure. This response is late, by the way, because I didn't know I got your comment till today (due to my ignorance about how this site handles comments). Later Note, 4 August 2011: is there anyone more stupid than the person who enters a discussion only to make an assertion (anonymously, of course), then disappears? --Bob As I said, roundedness is something I need to think about more. I, of course, am not implying that genius requires it but suggesting that
the higher one’s roundedness quotient is, the more effective one will
likely be at creating or postulating–although one’s creativity quotient
would outweigh it, as would a true intelligence quotient, which would
measure much more than short-term numeracy and literacy and the mental manipulation of geometric shapes and whatever else most IQ tests measure.

This response is late, by the way, because I didn’t know I got your comment till today (due to my ignorance about how this site handles comments).

Later Note, 4 August 2011: is there anyone more stupid than the person who enters a discussion only to make an assertion (anonymously, of course), then disappears?

–Bob

]]> By: Bob http://poeticks.com/2010/01/29/entry-89-chapter-1-11/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Bob Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:17:23 +0000 http://poeticks.com/2010/01/28/entry-89-chapter-1-11/#comment-123 Roundedness is wonderful, and fitting in is fabulous. However, genius doesn't require either to create or postulate. Roundedness is wonderful, and fitting in is fabulous. However, genius doesn’t require either to create or postulate.

]]>